The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pediatric teledermatology. A survey of current use
Open accessAbstract
Demand for pediatric dermatologic care far exceeds the supply of pediatric dermatologists. Teledermatology has been proposed as a solution to improve access to care, however, data regarding teledermatology use for pediatric patients are lacking. Surveys assessing use and experience with teledermatology were administered to pediatric dermatologists attending the 2006 Society for Pediatric Dermatology Annual Meeting and to programs offering teledermatology identified in the American Telemedicine Association's 2003 Teledermatology Survey. Over half of the 76 pediatric dermatologists responding to the survey had previous experience with teledermatology and nearly half currently use some form of teledermatology. For most, this represents nonreimbursed, store-and-forward consultations. Respondents noted that teledermatology allows more accurate triage of dermatology patients, decreases travel and outpatient clinic visits, and provides an avenue for ongoing support and education for primary care physicians. While difficulties exist, overcoming obstacles to the use of pediatric teledermatology and reimbursement for such services could improve access to expert pediatric dermatologic care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“few studies of teledermatology experiences focused on children's skin conditions have been reported to date [12,20,36].”
From Lessons learned after a three-year store and forward teledermatology experience using internet: Strengths and limitations (2012) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The American Telemedicine Association
Linkous, J. D., & Kvedar, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/135763305774472079 · Cited by 468
Teledermatology research review
Whited, J. D. (2006) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02427.x · Cited by 186
Gilmour, Campbell, S., Loane, M. A., Esmail, A., Griffiths, C. E. M., Roland, Parry, Corbett, Eedy, Gore, et al. (1998) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02318.x · Cited by 165
Patient satisfaction with realtime teledermatology in Northern Ireland
Loane, M. A., Bloomer, S. E., Corbett, R., Eedy, D. J., Gore, H. E., Mathews, C., Steele, K. H., & Wootton, R. (1998) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633981931254 · Cited by 139
Use of Telemedicine for Children With Special Health Care Needs
Karp, W. B., Grigsby, R. K., DSW, L., McSwiggan-Hardin, M., Pursley‐Crotteau, S., Adams, C. L. N., Bell, W., Stachura, M. E., & Kanto, W. P. (2000) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.105.4.843 · Cited by 119
Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals
Taylor, P., Goldsmith, P., Murray, K., Harris, D., & Barkley, A. (2001) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04023.x · Cited by 101
A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations
NORDAL, E. J., Moseng, D., Kvammen, B., & Løchen, M. (2001) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633011936507 · Cited by 95
Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life
Finch, T. L., May, C. R., Esmail, A., Griffiths, C. E. M., Shaw, N., Fitzgerald, D., Stewart, E., Mould, M., Morgan, M., Pickup, L., et al. (2001) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04472.x · Cited by 93
Private Payer Reimbursement for Telemedicine Services in The United States
Whitten, P. S., & Buis, L. R. (2007) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2006.0028 · Cited by 73
Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists
van den Akker, T. W., Reker, C. H. M., Knol, A., Post, J., Wilbrink, J., & van der Veen, J. P. W. (2001) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633011936390 · Cited by 70
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lowitt MH, 1998, Teledermatology and in‐person examinations: a comparison of patient and physician perceptions and diagnostic agreement, Arch Dermatol, 139, 81
- Schachner LA, 1995, Pediatric dermatology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Armstrong, A. W., Johnson, M. A., Lin, S., Maverakis, E., Fazel, N., & Liu, F.-T. (2015) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2299 · Cited by 90
Lasierra, N., Alesanco, A., Gilaberte, Y., Magallón, R., & García, J. (2012) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.008 · Cited by 72
Geriatric teledermatology: store‐and‐forward vs. face‐to‐face examination
Rubegni, P., Nami, N., Cevenini, G., Poggiali, S., Hofmann‐Wellenhof, R., Massone, C., Bilenchi, R., Bartalini, M., Cappelli, R., & Fimiani, M. (2011) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.03986.x · Cited by 49
Usability, Acceptability, and Impact of a Pediatric Teledermatology Mobile Health Application
Fiks, A. G., Fleisher, L., Berrigan, L., Sykes, E., Mayne, S. L., Gruver, R., Halkyard, K., Jew, O. S., FitzGerald, P., Winston, F., et al. (2018) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0075 · Cited by 39
Teledermatology: Kids are not just little people
Naka, F., Makkar, H., & Lu, J. (2017) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.08.009 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Fieleke, D. R., Edison, K., & Dyer, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- ORCID
- Edison, Karen
- Venue
- Pediatric Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-162
- ISSN
- 0736-8046 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1470
- OpenAlex
- W2028830439
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pediatric Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Imaging in Medicine
- Keywords
- teledermatology, health care access, store-and-forward telemedicine, telehealth reimbursement, triage, primary care physician training, barriers to telehealth
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Dermatology, Health Services Needs and Demand, Pediatrics, Population Surveillance, Societies, Medical, United States, Telemedicine, Videoconferencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
