Cited by 70Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyDigital Imaging in Medicine

Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists

van den Akker, Th W, Reker, C H M, Knol, A, Post, J, Wilbrink, J, van der Veen, J P W·2001·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

A feasibility study of teledermatology was undertaken in Groningen. Six general practitioners (GPs) sent digital images by email, along with relevant patient information, to dermatologists at the Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen, a general non-academic hospital. The dermatologists returned their responses by email. A total of 89 cases were dealt with in this way. On average, the GPs took three photographs per patient. The time taken by the GP to produce and transmit the images, and to implement the telemedicine advice received from the dermatologist, was 9 min and 3 min, respectively. The time spent on diagnosis, provision of advice and response by email amounted to 10 min for the dermatologist. It was concluded that teleconsultations by email are feasible in the daily practice of GPs and dermatologists in a general non-academic hospital. Generally, GPs, dermatologists and patients were satisfied with teleconsultations. Furthermore, GPs reported that 63% of the teleconsultations were of educational value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/1357633011936390

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Akker, T. W., Reker, C. H. M., Knol, A., Post, J., Wilbrink, J., & van der Veen, J. P. W.
Affiliations
  • Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Martini Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • General Practice, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • General Practice, Schiermonnikoog, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
193-198
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W1986567001
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
Keywords
teledermatology, teleconsultation, email communication, general practitioners, dermatologists, feasibility, patient satisfaction, dermatological diagnosis, non-academic hospitals
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Dermatology, Family Practice, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Netherlands, Referral and Consultation, Skin Diseases, Time Factors, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review