The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A shortened instrument for literacy screening
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Pelikan, J. M., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Slonska, Z., Kondilis, B., Stoffels, V., Osborne, R. H., & Brand, H. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-948 · Cited by 1,241
Friedman, D. B., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2006) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198105277329 · Cited by 517
Development and Validation of a Short-Form, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine
Arozullah, A. M., Yarnold, P. R., Bennett, C. L., Soltysik, R. C., Wolf, M. S., Ferreira, R. M., Lee, S.-Y. D., Costello, S., Shakir, A., Denwood, C., et al. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3180616c1b · Cited by 448
Health Literacy Measurement: An Inventory and Descriptive Summary of 51 Instruments
Haun, J. N., Valerio, M. A., McCormack, L. A., Sørensen, K., & Paasche-Orlow, M. K. (2014) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.936571 · Cited by 393
Patient health literacy and participation in the health‐care process
Ishikawa, H., & Yano, E. (2008) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00497.x · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Bass, P. F., Wilson, J. F., & Griffith, C. H.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1036-1038
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- OpenAlex
- W2133046038
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A shortened instrument for literacy screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.10651.x
- The paper
- Bass, P. F., Wilson, J. F., & Griffith, C. H. (2003). A shortened instrument for literacy screening. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.10651.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
