The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of a Short-Form, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although prior studies used the 66-item Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM instrument) for literacy assessment, researchers may require a shorter, validated instrument when designing interventions for clinical contexts. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a very brief literacy assessment tool, the REALM-Short Form (REALM-SF). PATIENTS: The model development, validation, and field testing validation samples included 1336, 164, and 50 patients, respectively. SETTING: General medicine and subspecialty clinics and medicine inpatient wards. DESIGN: For development and validation samples, indicator variables for REALM instrument items were evaluated as potential predictors of REALM instrument score by stepwise multiple regression analysis with subsequent bootstrap and confirmatory factor analysis of selected items. Pearson correlations compared REALM-SF and REALM instrument scores and kappa analyses compared grade level assignments. For the field testing validation sample, Pearson correlations compared Wide Range Achievement Test and REALM-SF scores. RESULTS: The REALM-SF included 7 items with stable model coefficients and 1 underlying linear factor. REALM-SF and REALM instrument scores were highly correlated in development (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and validation (r = 0.94, P < 0.001) samples. There was excellent agreement between REALM-SF and REALM instrument grade-level assignments when dichotomized at the 6th grade (development: 97% agreement, K = 0.88, P < 0.001; validation: 88% agreement, K = 0.75, P < 0.001) and 8th grade levels (development: 94% agreement, K = 0.78, P < 0.001; validation: 84% agreement, K = 0.67, P < 0.001). REALM-SF and Wide Range Achievement Test scores were highly correlated (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) in field testing validation. CONCLUSIONS: The REALM-SF provides researchers a brief, validated instrument for assessing patient literacy in diverse research settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25 · Cited by 38,891
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488486 · Cited by 8,538
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994) · Cited by 2,388
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Cited by
Assessing and Addressing Health Literacy
Cornett, S. (2009) · OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing · doi:10.3912/ojin.vol14no03man02 · Cited by 116
Gawande, R., To, M. N., Pine, E., Griswold, T., Creedon, T. B., Brunel, A., Lozada, A., Loucks, E. B., & Schuman-Olivier, Z. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4739-5 · Cited by 75
Predictors of Medication Continuity in Children With ADHD
Brinkman, W. B., Sucharew, H., Majcher, J. H., & Epstein, J. N. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2017-2580 · Cited by 47
Stockdill, M. L., Dionne-Odom, J. N., Wells, R., Ejem, D., Azuero, A., Keebler, K., Sockwell, E., Tims, S., Burgio, K. L., Engler, S., et al. (2023) · Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.1177/0825859720975978 · Cited by 11
Acceptance of Illness Among Patients Pursuing Transplantation or Left Ventricular Assist Device
Miller-Matero, L. R., Hecht, L. M., Elsiss, F., Miller, M. K., Son, J., Ling, S., Segal, A., & Bryce, K. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-021-09793-1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Arozullah, A. M., Yarnold, P. R., Bennett, C. L., Soltysik, R. C., Wolf, M. S., Ferreira, R. M., Lee, S.-Y. D., Costello, S., Shakir, A., Denwood, C., Bryant, F. B., & Davis, T.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1026-1033
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077796847
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a Short-Form, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3180616c1b
- The paper
- Arozullah, A. M., Yarnold, P. R., Bennett, C. L., Soltysik, R. C., Wolf, M. S., Ferreira, R. M., Lee, S.-Y. D., Costello, S., Shakir, A., Denwood, C., Bryant, F. B., & Davis, T. (2007). Development and Validation of a Short-Form, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3180616c1b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.