Cited by 546Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Characteristics and circumstances of falls in a hospital setting: A prospective analysis

Open access
Hitcho, Eileen B., Krauss, Melissa J., Birge, Stanley, Dunagan, William Claiborne, Fischer, Irene, Johnson, Shirley, Nast, Patricia A., Costantinou, Eileen +1 more·2004·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objective To describe the epidemiology of hospital inpatient falls, including characteristics of patients who fall, circumstances of falls, and fall-related injuries.Design Prospective descriptive study of inpatient falls. Data on patient characteristics, fall circumstances, and injury were collected through interviews with patients and/or nurses and review of adverse event reports and medical records. Fall rates and nurse staffing levels were compared by service.Setting A 1,300-bed urban academic hospital over 13 weeks.Patients All inpatient falls reported for medicine, cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, surgery, oncology, and women and infants services during the study period were included. Falls in the psychiatry service and falls during physical therapy sessions were excluded.Measurements and main results A total of 183 patients fell during the study period. The average age of patients who fell was 63.4 years (range 17 to 96). Many falls were unassisted (79%) and occurred in the patient's room (85%), during the evening/overnight (59%), and during ambulation (19%). Half of the falls (50%) were elimination related, which was more common in patients over 65 years old (83% vs 48%; P <.001). Elimination-related falls increased the risk of fall-related injury (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.3). The medicine and neurology services had the highest fall rates (both were 6.12 falls per 1,000 patient-days), and the highest patient to nurse ratios (6.5 and 5.3, respectively).Conclusions Falls in the hospital affect young as well as older patients, are often unassisted, and involve elimination-related activities. Further studies are necessary to prevent hospital falls and reduce fall injury rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30387.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged hospitalization increases risk for adverse outcomes including accelerated functional decline, delirium, pressure ulcers, nosocomial infections and falls.

    “First, prolonged hospitalization increases risk for adverse outcomes including accelerated functional decline, delirium, pressure ulcers, nosocomial infections and falls [8–12].”

    From Risk factors, costs and complications of delayed hospital discharge from internal medicine wards at a Canadian academic medical centre: retrospective cohort study (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Abstract reports that falls among hospital inpatients are common, supporting the falls portion of the cited statement. The paper does not establish that a longer hospital stay increases fall risk; its prospective study describes the circumstances and rates of inpatient falls, not risk by length of stay. The other listed outcomes are not attributed specifically to this paper within the citation range. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hitcho, E. B., Krauss, M. J., Birge, S., Dunagan, W. C., Fischer, I., Johnson, S., Nast, P. A., Costantinou, E., & Fraser, V. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • BJC HealthCare (US)
  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Krauss, Melissa J.
  • Fraser, Victoria J.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2004-07
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
732-739
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2050520474
Cited by
546
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 37
FWCI
27.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
inpatient falls, fall-related injuries, fall epidemiology, nurse-to-patient ratio, nurse staffing, fall prevention, fall circumstances, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Workforce, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Demography, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Missouri, Nursing Service, Hospital, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review