CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 242Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Religious characteristics of U.S. physicians: A national survey

Open access
Curlin, Farr A., Lantos, John D., Roach, Chad J., Sellergren, Sarah A., Chin, Marshall H.·2005·Journal of General Internal Medicine
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0119.xPMC PMC1490160
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background Patients' religious commitments and religious communities are known to influence their experiences of illness and their medical decisions. Physicians are also dynamic partners in the doctor-patient relationship, yet little is known about the religious characteristics of physicians or how physicians' religious commitments shape the clinical encounter.Objective To provide a baseline description of physicians' religious characteristics, and to compare physicians' characteristics with those of the general U.S. population.Design/participants Mailed survey of a stratified random sample of 2,000 practicing U.S. physicians. Comparable U.S. population data are derived from the 1998 General Social Survey.Measurements/results The response rate was 63%. Fifty-five percent of physicians say their religious beliefs influence their practice of medicine. Compared with the general population, physicians are more likely to be affiliated with religions that are underrepresented in the United States, less likely to say they try to carry their religious beliefs over into all other dealings in life (58% vs 73%), twice as likely to consider themselves spiritual but not religious (20% vs 9%), and twice as likely to cope with major problems in life without relying on God (61% vs 29%).Conclusions Physicians' religious characteristics are diverse and they differ in many ways from those of the general population. Researchers, medical educators, and policy makers should further examine the ways in which physicians' religious commitments shape their clinical engagements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0119.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Daaleman TP, Frey B. Spiritual and religious beliefs and practices of family physicians. J Fam Practice. 1999;48:98–104.
  2. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004:321–8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 242

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Curlin, F. A., Lantos, J. D., Roach, C. J., Sellergren, S. A., & Chin, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Curlin, Farr A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
629-634
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
DOI
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0119.x
PMC
PMC1490160
OpenAlex
W1992405972
Cited by
242
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Greenwall Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
religion and medicine, spiritual but not religious, religious affiliation, physician-patient relationship, religious commitment, general population comparison
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Religion and Medicine, United States, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review