Cited by 114Interpreting and Communication in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareTranslation Studies and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns of communication through interpreters: A detailed sociolinguistic analysis

Open access
Aranguri, Cesar, Davidson, Brad, Ramirez, Robert·2006·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Numerous articles have detailed how the presence of an interpreter leads to less satisfactory communication with physicians; few have studied how actual communication takes place through an interpreter in a clinical setting.Objective Record and analyze physician-interpreter-patient interactions.Design Primary care physicians with high-volume Hispanic practices were recruited for a communication study. Dyslipidemic Hispanic patients, either monolingual Spanish or bilingual Spanish-English, were recruited on the day of a normally scheduled appointment and, once consented, recorded without a researcher present in the room. Separate postvisit interviews were conducted with the patient and the physician. All interactions were fully transcribed and analyzed.Participants Sixteen patients were recorded interacting with 9 physicians. Thirteen patients used an interpreter with 8 physicians, and 3 patients spoke Spanish with the 1 bilingual physician.Approach Transcript analysis based on sociolinguistic and discourse analytic techniques, including but not limited to time speaking, analysis of questions asked and answered, and the loss of semantic information.Results Speech was significantly reduced and revised by the interpreter, resulting in an alteration of linguistic features such as content, meaning, reinforcement/validation, repetition, and affect. In addition, visits that included an interpreter had virtually no rapport-building "small talk," which typically enables the physician to gain comprehensive patient history, learn clinically relevant information, and increase emotional engagement in treatment.Conclusions The presence of an interpreter increases the difficulty of achieving good physician-patient communication. Physicians and interpreters should be trained in the process of communication and interpretation, to minimize conversational loss and maximize the information and relational exchange with interpreted patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00451.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR (eds.) Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Dispartities in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aranguri, C., Davidson, B., & Ramirez, R.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Aranguri, Cesar
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2006-06
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
623-629
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2041627242
Cited by
114
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Georgetown University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
Keywords
medical interpreters, physician-patient communication, Spanish-speaking patients, Hispanic patients, interpreter-mediated communication, rapport building, primary care, dyslipidemia, interpreter training
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Language, Nonverbal Communication, Physician-Patient Relations, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review