The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrically Conductive Biodegradable Polymer Composite for Nerve Regeneration: Electricity‐Stimulated Neurite Outgrowth and Axon Regeneration
Abstract
Abstract: Normal and electrically stimulated PC12 cell cultures and the implantation of nerve guidance channels were performed to evaluate newly developed electrically conductive biodegradable polymer composites. Polypyrrole (PPy) doped by butane sulfonic acid showed a significantly higher number of viable cells compared with PPy doped by polystyrenesulfonate after a 6‐day culture. The PC12 cells were left to proliferate for 6 days, and the PPy‐coated membranes, showing less initial cell adherence, recorded the same proliferation rate as did the noncoated membranes. Direct current electricity at various intensities was applied to the PC12 cell‐cultured conductive membranes. After 7 days, the greatest number of neurites appeared on the membranes with a current intensity approximating 1.7–8.4 μA/cm. Nerve guidance channels made of conductive biodegradable composite were implanted into rats to replace 8 mm of sciatic nerve. The implants were harvested after 2 months and analyzed with immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. The regenerated nerve tissue displayed myelinated axons and Schwann cells that were similar to those in the native nerve. Electrical stimulation applied through the electrically conductive biodegradable polymers therefore enhanced neurite outgrowth in a current‐dependent fashion. The conductive polymers also supported sciatic nerve regeneration in rats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conducting Polymers for Tissue Engineering
Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2018) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00276 · Cited by 835
Polypyrrole-coated electrospun PLGA nanofibers for neural tissue applications
Lee, J. Y., Bashur, C. A., Goldstein, A. S., & Schmidt, C. E. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.042 · Cited by 735
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Nanomaterials for Neural Interfaces
Kotov, N. A., Winter, J. O., Clements, I. P., Jan, E., Timko, B. P., Campidelli, S., Pathak, S., Mazzatenta, A., Lieber, C. M., Prato, M., et al. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200801984 · Cited by 504
Current and Novel Polymeric Biomaterials for Neural Tissue Engineering
Boni, R., Ali, A., Shavandi, A., & Clarkson, A. N. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-018-0491-8 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Rouabhia, M., Wang, Z., Roberge, C., Shi, G., Roche, P., Li, J., & Dao, L. H.
- Venue
- Artificial Organs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-21
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-22
- ISSN
- 0160-564X (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1594
- OpenAlex
- W2022799308
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrically Conductive Biodegradable Polymer Composite for Nerve Regeneration: Electricity‐Stimulated Neurite Outgrowth and Axon Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00335.x
- The paper
- Zhang, Z., Rouabhia, M., Wang, Z., Roberge, C., Shi, G., Roche, P., Li, J., & Dao, L. H. (2007). Electrically Conductive Biodegradable Polymer Composite for Nerve Regeneration: Electricity‐Stimulated Neurite Outgrowth and Axon Regeneration. Artificial Organs. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00335.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.