Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 801

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

“How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration

McKay, John K., Christian, Caroline E., Harrison, Susan, Rice, Kevin J.·2005·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

In plant conservation, restoration (the augmentation or reestablishment of an extinct population or community) is a valuable tool to mitigate the loss of habitat. However, restoration efforts can result in the introduction of novel genes and genotypes into populations when plant materials used are not of local origin. This movement is potentially important because many plant species are subdivided into populations that are adapted to local environmental conditions. Here we focus on genetic concerns arising from ongoing restoration efforts, where often little is known about “How local is local?” (i.e., the geographic or environmental scale over which plant species are adapted). We review the major issues regarding gene flow and local adaptation in the restoration of natural plant populations. Finally, we offer some practical, commonsense guidelines for the consideration of genetic structure when restoring natural plant populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00058.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 801

Metadata

Authors
McKay, J. K., Christian, C. E., Harrison, S., & Rice, K. J.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-15
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
432-440
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2138092548
Cited by
801
References
0
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00058.x
The paper
McKay, J. K., Christian, C. E., Harrison, S., & Rice, K. J. (2005). “How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00058.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.