The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration
Abstract
In plant conservation, restoration (the augmentation or reestablishment of an extinct population or community) is a valuable tool to mitigate the loss of habitat. However, restoration efforts can result in the introduction of novel genes and genotypes into populations when plant materials used are not of local origin. This movement is potentially important because many plant species are subdivided into populations that are adapted to local environmental conditions. Here we focus on genetic concerns arising from ongoing restoration efforts, where often little is known about “How local is local?” (i.e., the geographic or environmental scale over which plant species are adapted). We review the major issues regarding gene flow and local adaptation in the restoration of natural plant populations. Finally, we offer some practical, commonsense guidelines for the consideration of genetic structure when restoring natural plant populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective
Weeks, A. R., Sgro, C. M., Young, A. G., Frankham, R., Mitchell, N. J., Miller, K. A., Byrne, M., Coates, D. J., Eldridge, M. D. B., Sunnucks, P., et al. (2011) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x · Cited by 916
van Katwijk, M. M., Bos, A. R., de Jonge, V. N., Hanssen, L. S. A. M., Hermus, D. C. R., & de Jong, D. J. (2009) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.09.028 · Cited by 323
Cultivar development of kelps for commercial cultivation-past lessons and future prospects.
Goecke, F., Klemetsdal, G., & Ergon, Å. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00110 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- McKay, J. K., Christian, C. E., Harrison, S., & Rice, K. J.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 432-440
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2138092548
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00058.x
- The paper
- McKay, J. K., Christian, C. E., Harrison, S., & Rice, K. J. (2005). “How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00058.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.