Cited by 108Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

Recommendations for Integrating Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the Southwestern United States

Open access
Noss, Reed F., Beier, Paul, Wallace Covington, W., Edward Grumbine, R., Lindenmayer, David B., Prather, John W., Schmiegelow, Fiona, Sisk, Thomas D. +1 more·2006·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

Over the past century, ponderosa pine–dominated landscapes of the southwestern United States have been altered by human activities such as grazing, timber harvest, road building, and fire exclusion. Most forested areas within these landscapes now show increased susceptibility to stand‐replacing fires, insect outbreaks, and drought‐related mortality. Recent large wildfires in the region have spurred public interest in large‐scale fuel reduction and restoration programs, which create perceived and real conflicts with the conservation of biodiversity. Conservation concerns include the potential for larger road networks, soil and understory disturbance, exotic plant invasion, and the removal of large trees in treated areas. Pursuing prescribed burning, thinning, or other treatments on the broad scale that many scientists and managers envision requires the reconciliation of ecological restoration with biodiversity conservation. This study presents recommendations from a workshop for integrating the principles and practices of restoration ecology and conservation biology, toward the objective of restoring the composition, structure, and function of dry ponderosa pine forests. Planning on the scale of hundreds of thousands of hectares offers opportunities to achieve multiple objectives (e.g., rare species protection and restoration of ecological structures and processes) that cannot easily be addressed on a site‐by‐site basis. However, restoration must be coordinated with conservation planning to achieve mutual objectives and should include strict guidelines for protection of rare, declining, and sensitive habitats and species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00099.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under certain conditions wildland fire can promote significant ecological benefits and reduce the risk that high intensity fires will spread to areas of high value into the future.

    “Under certain conditions wildland fire can promote significant ecological benefits and reduce the risk that high intensity fires will spread to areas of high value into the future (Noss et al. 2006).”

    From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Noss et al. 2006

  • There is general scientific agreement that fuel loading and stand density have reduced the resilience of dry frequent fire pine forests by making them more susceptible to wildfire and insect and disease outbreaks.

    “There is general scientific agreement that fuel loading and stand density have reduced the resilience of these forests by making them more susceptible to wildfire and insect and disease outbreaks (Allen et al. 2002;Hessburg et al. 2005;Noss et al. 2006).”

    From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Noss et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noss, R. F., Beier, P., Wallace Covington, W., Edward Grumbine, R., Lindenmayer, D. B., Prather, J. W., Schmiegelow, F., Sisk, T. D., & Vosick, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Noss, Reed F.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
4-10
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2111312941
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Restoration Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
ponderosa pine forests, conservation biology, prescribed burning, forest thinning, fire suppression, stand-replacing fire, biodiversity conservation, conservation planning, exotic plant invasion, southwestern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review