Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating Soil Ecological Knowledge into Restoration Management

Heneghan, Liam, Miller, Susan P., Baer, Sara, Callaham, Mac A., Montgomery, James, Pavao‐Zuckerman, Mitchell, Rhoades, Charles C., Richardson, Sarah·2008·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

The variability in the type of ecosystem degradation and the specificity of restoration goals can challenge restorationists’ ability to generalize about approaches that lead to restoration success. The discipline of soil ecology, which emphasizes both soil organisms and ecosystem processes, has generated a body of knowledge that can be generally useful in improving the outcomes of restoration despite this variability. Here, we propose that the usefulness of this soil ecological knowledge (SEK) for restoration is best considered in the context of the severity of the original perturbation, the goals of the project, and the resilience of the ecosystem to disturbance. A straightforward manipulation of single physical, chemical, or biological components of the soil system can be useful in the restoration of a site, especially when the restoration goal is loosely defined in terms of the species and processes that management seeks to achieve. These single‐factor manipulations may in fact produce cascading effects on several ecosystem attributes and can result in unintended recovery trajectories. When complex outcomes are desired, intentional and holistic integration of all aspects of the soil knowledge is necessary. We provide a short roster of examples to illustrate that SEK benefits management and restoration of ecosystems and suggest areas for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00477.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Heneghan, L., Miller, S. P., Baer, S., Callaham, M. A., Montgomery, J., Pavao‐Zuckerman, M., Rhoades, C. C., & Richardson, S.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-26
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
608-617
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2138708021
Cited by
240
References
5
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating Soil Ecological Knowledge into Restoration Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00477.x
The paper
Heneghan, L., Miller, S. P., Baer, S., Callaham, M. A., Montgomery, J., Pavao‐Zuckerman, M., Rhoades, C. C., & Richardson, S. (2008). Integrating Soil Ecological Knowledge into Restoration Management. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00477.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.