PLANT DIVERSITY, SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ARE THERE ANY LINKS?
Open accessAbstract
A current debate in ecology centers on the extent to which ecosystem function depends on biodiversity. Here, we provide evidence from a long-term field manipulation of plant diversity that soil microbial communities, and the key ecosystem processes that they mediate, are significantly altered by plant species richness. After seven years of plant growth, we determined the composition and function of soil microbial communities beneath experimental plant diversity treatments containing 1–16 species. Microbial community biomass, respiration, and fungal abundance significantly increased with greater plant diversity, as did N mineralization rates. However, changes in microbial community biomass, activity, and composition largely resulted from the higher levels of plant production associated with greater diversity, rather than from plant diversity per se. Nonetheless, greater plant production could not explain more rapid N mineralization, indicating that plant diversity affected this microbial process, which controls rates of ecosystem N cycling. Greater N availability probably contributed to the positive relationship between plant diversity and productivity in the N-limited soils of our experiment, suggesting that plant–microbe interactions in soil are an integral component of plant diversity's influence on ecosystem function.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a seven-year plant diversity experiment, soil microbial biomass, respiration, fungal abundance, and gross N mineralization increased with plant species richness. Most microbial responses were explained by greater plant production associated with diversity, but faster N mineralization remained linked to plant diversity itself.
Key findings
- Microbial biomass (total PLFA) increased with plant diversity (ANOVA; F = 5.16, df = 4, 111; P < 0.001), but the effect became nonsignificant when plant biomass was included as a covariate (F = 1.09, df = 1, 110; P = 0.365), while plant biomass was significant (F = 23.13, df = 1, 110; P < 0.0001).
- Microbial community composition shifted with diversity: bacterial and actinomycetal PLFAs declined and fungal biomarkers increased; the 1-species treatment differed from the 16-species treatment (P < 0.001–0.053), but diversity became nonsignificant with plant biomass as a covariate (P = 0.137–0.980).
- Microbial respiration increased with plant diversity (F = 11.68, df = 4, 111; P < 0.001), but adjusted means showed no relationship with diversity; plant biomass was significant in ANCOVA (F = 47.49, df = 4, 111; P < 0.001).
- Gross N mineralization nearly doubled from 1- to 16-species treatments (F = 10.6, df = 4, 111; P < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment for plant biomass and soil organic matter (least-square means: R² = 0.320, P < 0.001); immobilization of NH₄⁺ (F = 0.67, P = 0.614) and NO₃⁻ (F = 0.85, P = 0.497) showed no diversity effect. Plant N content increased from 4.29 ± 0.456 g N/m² in 1-species to 12.5 ± 0.493 g N/m² in 16-species treatments (F = 25.10, df = 4, 115; P < 0.001).
Methods
- Long-term field experiment at Cedar Creek Natural History Area, Minnesota: 168 plots (9 × 9 m) seeded in 1994 with 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 grassland-savanna species drawn from a pool of 18 species; 116 plots sampled in July 2000 with replication n = 39, 24, 12, 12, and 29 for the 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-species treatments.
- Soil cores (2.5 cm diameter, 20 cm deep) from eight random locations per plot were composited; microbial composition and biomass were assessed by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, respiration by CO₂ increase over a two-day incubation, and gross N mineralization/immobilization by ¹⁵N pool dilution.
- Analyses used one-way ANOVA, ANCOVA with plant biomass as covariate, nonlinear regression on treatment means (n = 5), and two-way ANOVAs testing species richness plus functional group presence; monocultures of the 18 species were also compared.
Limitations
- The paper states that the exact mechanisms causing greater rates of N mineralization remain to be determined.
- The paper states that the results are likely most evident in ecosystems with small existing soil substrate pools; this experiment’s soil contained very little organic matter (4–5 g C/kg) relative to another experiment (130 g C/kg) where plant diversity did not influence soil microbial communities and litter decomposition.
- Evident from the text: there is no explicit limitations section; microbial composition is inferred from PLFA biomarkers rather than direct taxonomy, and the microbial sampling was from a single date (July 2000) with uneven replication across diversity treatments.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 11 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Greater plant production could not explain more rapid N mineralization.
“Nonetheless, greater plant production could not explain more rapid N mineralization, indicating that plant diversity affected this microbial process, which controls rates of ecosystem N cycling.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · hedged
“However, when N mineralization was adjusted for differences in plant production, there was still a significant relationship with plant diversity, indicating that greater rates of decomposition were not the only mechanism at work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · hedged
- Findingown data
The balance between gross N mineralization and immobilization was altered by plant diversity such that the net supply of soil N increased with the number of plant species present.
“In our experiment, the balance between gross N mineralization and immobilization was altered by plant diversity such that the net supply of soil N increased with the number of plant species present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No relationship was observed between plant diversity and abundance of microbial groups when individual PLFAs were adjusted for variation in plant biomass.
“We also observed no relationship between plant diversity and the abundance of microbial groups when individual PLFAs were adjusted for variation in plant biomass (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Soil microbial communities and the key ecosystem processes they mediate are significantly altered by plant species richness.
“Here, we provide evidence from a long-term field manipulation of plant diversity that soil microbial communities, and the key ecosystem processes that they mediate, are significantly altered by plant species richness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
- Findingown data
Total plant N content increased significantly from the 1- to 16-species treatments.
“We observed that total plant N content increased significantly from the 1-to 16-species treatments (F ϭ 25.10, df ϭ 4, 111; P Ͻ 0.001), which is consistent with the general increase in gross N mineralization that we observed across our diversity treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
N mineralization rates significantly increased with greater plant diversity.
“Microbial community biomass, respiration, and fungal abundance significantly increased with greater plant diversity, as did N mineralization rates.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · plain
“Gross N mineralization nearly doubled from the 1-to 16-species treatments (ANOVA; F ϭ 10.6, df ϭ 4, 111; P Ͻ 0.001) and displayed a predictable increase across the range of diversity in our experiment (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
The relationship between gross N mineralization and plant diversity remained significant after adjusting for differences in plant biomass and soil organic matter.
“This relationship occurred even when we adjusted rates of gross N mineralization for differences in plant biomass and soil organic matter among treatments, indicating that plant diversity enhanced the microbial release of NH 4 ϩ from soil organic matter (Fig. 4B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When rates of specific respiration were adjusted for variation in plant biomass, there was no relationship between plant diversity and specific microbial respiration.
“Again, when we adjusted rates of specific respiration for variation in plant biomass among treatments, we found no relationship between plant diversity and specific microbial respiration (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment means of total PLFA adjusted for variation in plant biomass showed no relationship with plant species richness.
“Moreover, treatment means of total PLFA adjusted for variation in plant biomass showed no relationship with plant species richness (Fig. 1B), suggesting that plant diversity impacted microbial biomass mainly via increases in plant production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Changes in microbial community biomass, activity, and composition largely resulted from higher levels of plant production associated with greater diversity, rather than from plant diversity per se.
“However, changes in microbial community biomass, activity, and composition largely resulted from the higher levels of plant production associated with greater diversity, rather than from plant diversity per se.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 1999, the 16-species treatment had a greater soil matric potential (more soil water) than the other treatments.
“However, significant differences occurred in 1999, with the 16-species treatment having a greater matric potential (i.e., more soil water; Ϫ0.013 Ϯ 0.000 MPa) than the other treatments (Ϫ0.014 to Ϫ0.019 MPa).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Microbial community biomass significantly increased with greater plant diversity.
“Microbial community biomass, respiration, and fungal abundance significantly increased with greater plant diversity, as did N mineralization rates.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · plain
“Total PLFA, an estimate of microbial community biomass, significantly increased with plant diversity and was significantly greater in the 8-and 16species treatments compared to the lower levels of species richness (ANOVA; F ϭ 5.16, df ϭ 4, 111; P Ͻ 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
Microbial respiration significantly increased with greater plant diversity.
“Microbial community biomass, respiration, and fungal abundance significantly increased with greater plant diversity, as did N mineralization rates.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · plain
“During organic matter decomposition, microbial respiration returns photosynthetically fixed C to the atmosphere, and this microbial process increased significantly with plant diversity (ANOVA; F ϭ 11.68, df ϭ 4, 111; P Ͻ 0.001); mean rates in the 8-and 16species treatments were significantly greater than rates in the other treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
When plant biomass was included as a covariate, plant diversity became nonsignificant for each PLFA illustrated in Fig. 2.
“However, when we included plant biomass as a covariate in our analyses, plant diversity again became nonsignificant (P ϭ 0.137-0.980).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fungal abundance significantly increased with greater plant diversity.
“Microbial community biomass, respiration, and fungal abundance significantly increased with greater plant diversity, as did N mineralization rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When mean rates of microbial respiration were adjusted for differences in plant biomass, there was no relationship between plant diversity and microbial respiration.
“Plant biomass was significant in our ANCOVA (F ϭ 47.49, df ϭ 4, 111; P Ͻ 0.001), and when mean rates of microbial respiration were adjusted for differences in plant biomass, we observed no relationship between plant diversity and microbial respiration (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This feedback is likely to be most evident in ecosystems where existing substrate pools in soil (organic matter) are small relative to amounts entering soil from plant detritus.
“This feedback is likely to be most evident in ecosystems where existing substrate pools in soil (i.e., organic matter) are small relative to amounts entering soil from plant detritus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effect of plant species richness on heterotrophic microbial communities would be most apparent in soil containing relatively low initial quantities of growth-limiting organic substrates (organic matter).
- Interpretationown data
Plant diversity impacted microbial biomass mainly via increases in plant production.
“Moreover, treatment means of total PLFA adjusted for variation in plant biomass showed no relationship with plant species richness (Fig. 1B), suggesting that plant diversity impacted microbial biomass mainly via increases in plant production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Plant-microbe interactions in soil are an integral component of plant diversity's influence on ecosystem function.
“Greater N availability probably contributed to the positive relationship between plant diversity and productivity in the N-limited soils of our experiment, suggesting that plant-microbe interactions in soil are an integral component of plant diversity's influence on ecosystem function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
- Interpretationreasoning
Plant diversity affected the microbial process of N mineralization, which controls rates of ecosystem N cycling.
“Nonetheless, greater plant production could not explain more rapid N mineralization, indicating that plant diversity affected this microbial process, which controls rates of ecosystem N cycling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
- Premisecitation
Few studies have experimentally investigated the influence of plant diversity on soil microorganisms.
“However, few studies have experimentally investigated the influence of plant diversity on soil microorganisms (Bargett and Shine 1999, Wardle et al. 1999, Stephan et al. 2000), yet there are reasons to expect that plant diversity could affect microbial communities and the ecosystem processes they mediate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bargett and Shine 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wardle et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stephan et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
These data support the idea that plant diversity, rather than plant-mediated changes in the soil environment across diversity treatments, influenced soil microbial communities.
“These data support the idea that plant diversity, rather than plant-mediated changes in the soil environment across diversity treatments, influenced soil microbial communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The loss of plant species may have the greatest impact on microbial communities in ecosystems containing infertile soils poor in organic matter.
“Our results imply that the loss of plant species may have the greatest impact on microbial communities in ecosystems containing infertile soils poor in organic matter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effect of plant species richness on heterotrophic microbial communities would be most apparent in soil containing relatively low initial quantities of growth-limiting organic substrates (organic matter).
- Interpretationown data
Higher levels of plant production associated with greater plant diversity fostered a shift in microbial community composition.
“Our analysis suggests that higher levels of plant production associated with greater plant diversity fostered a shift in microbial community composition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Plant productivity in old fields and prairies surrounding the experiment is limited by soil N.
“Plant productivity in old fields and prairies surrounding our experiment is limited by soil N (Tilman 1987), the supply of which is controlled by the balance between microbial mineralization (i.e., release) and immobilization (i.e., assimilation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tilman 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Plant diversity impacted ecosystem processes by modifying the composition and function of heterotrophic microbial communities in soil.
“Our results demonstrate that plant diversity impacted ecosystem processes by modifying the composition and function of heterotrophic microbial communities in soil.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
- Interpretationown data
Plant diversity enhanced the microbial release of NH4+ from soil organic matter.
“This relationship occurred even when we adjusted rates of gross N mineralization for differences in plant biomass and soil organic matter among treatments, indicating that plant diversity enhanced the microbial release of NH 4 ϩ from soil organic matter (Fig. 4B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The response of soil microbial communities can be an integral component of plant diversity's influence on ecosystem function.
“They also demonstrate that the response of soil microbial communities can be an integral component of plant diversity's influence on ecosystem function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
- Interpretationreasoning
Greater N availability probably contributed to the positive relationship between plant diversity and productivity in the N-limited soils of the experiment.
“Greater N availability probably contributed to the positive relationship between plant diversity and productivity in the N-limited soils of our experiment, suggesting that plant-microbe interactions in soil are an integral component of plant diversity's influence on ecosystem function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tilman et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tilman et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
- May combine two claims. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicrobial community composition changed with greater plant diversity, an effect more attributable to increases in plant production than to greater species richness.
“Microbial community composition changed with greater plant diversity, an effect that also appears more attributable to increases in plant production than to greater species richness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlant diversity had no effect on the microbial assimilation of NH4+ or NO3-.
“In contrast, plant diversity had no effect on the microbial assimilation of NH 4 ϩ (ANOVA; F ϭ 0.67, df ϭ 4, 115; P ϭ 0.614) or NO 3 Ϫ (ANOVA; F ϭ 0.85, df ϭ 4, 115; P ϭ 0.497), and there was no relationship between plant diversity and these microbial processes (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSpecific respiration increased with plant diversity.
“Rates of specific respiration, which account for differences in microbial biomass among treatments (i.e., CO 2 produced per unit of microbial biomass), demonstrated that plant diversity significantly and predictably increased the metabolic activity of soil microbial communities (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen N mineralization was adjusted for differences in plant production, there was still a significant relationship with plant diversity, indicating that greater rates of decomposition were not the only mechanism at work.
“However, when N mineralization was adjusted for differences in plant production, there was still a significant relationship with plant diversity, indicating that greater rates of decomposition were not the only mechanism at work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect of plant diversity on microbial biomass became nonsignificant when plant biomass was included as a covariate, while plant biomass was significant.
“Nonetheless, the effect of plant diversity on microbial biomass became nonsignificant (ANCOVA; Type III SS; F ϭ 1.09, df ϭ 1, 110; P ϭ 0.365) when we included plant biomass as a covariate (ANCOVA; F ϭ 23.13, df ϭ 1, 110; P Ͻ 0.0001; Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPlant diversity altered microbial community composition and function, which, in turn, increased the supply of soil N to plants and contributed to greater productivity in the most species-rich experimental plant communities.
“Although the exact mechanisms causing greater rates of N mineralization remains to be determined, plant diversity altered microbial community composition and function, which, in turn, increased the supply of soil N to plants and contributed to greater productivity in the most species-rich experimental plant communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSoils beneath the experimental plant communities did not differ significantly in C or N concentration, but soil C:N was somewhat higher in the 16-species treatment compared to the others.
“Soils beneath our experimental plant communities did not differ significantly in C or N concentration, but soil C: N was somewhat higher in the 16-species treatment compared to the others (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFeedbacks between plant and microbial communities control ecosystem productivity, and plant species richness is an important factor influencing this biotic interaction.
“Feedbacks between plant and microbial communities control ecosystem productivity, and our results demonstrate that plant species richness is an important factor influencing this biotic interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe pattern of gross N mineralization roughly matched the increase in microbial respiration, suggesting that greater microbial activity is one mechanism behind the increase in N mineralization.
“The pattern of gross N mineralization roughly matched the increase in microbial respiration, suggesting that greater microbial activity is one mechanism behind the increase in N mineralization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSoil in the experiment contained very little organic matter (4-5 g C/kg) relative to another experiment (130 g C/kg) in which plant diversity did not influence soil microbial communities and litter decomposition.
“For example, soil in our experiment contained very little organic matter (4-5 g C/kg) relative to another experiment (130 g C/kg) in which plant diversity did not influence soil microbial communities and litter decomposition (Wardle et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wardle et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRecovery of added isotope averaged 83.4 ± 2.15% in 15NH4+ amended soil, and recovery averaged 81.6 ± 2.40% in samples that received 15NO3-.
“Recovery of added isotope averaged 83.4 Ϯ 2.15% in 15 NH 4 ϩ amended soil, and recovery averaged 81.6 Ϯ 2.40% in samples that received 15 NO 3 Ϫ .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNiche complementarity and the greater microbial supply of growth-limiting soil N are likely mechanisms that fostered higher levels of plant productivity in the most species-rich experimental communities.
“Niche complementarity and the greater microbial supply of growth-limiting soil N are likely to be mechanisms that fostered higher levels of plant productivity in the most species-rich experimental communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the experiment, plant productivity increases with greater species richness, apparently the result of niche complementarity and positive interaction among plant species.
“In our experiment, plant productivity increases with greater species richness, apparently the result of niche complementarity and positive interaction among plant species (Tilman et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tilman et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenUsing treatment means (n=5) in regression analyses provided a more conservative assessment of significance than using data from all plots (n=116).
“We used treatment means (n ϭ 5) of microbial community biomass, respiration, and rates of gross mineralization and immobilization in our regression analyses, which provided a more conservative assessment of significance than using data from all plots (n ϭ 116).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGreater plant species or functional group richness can foster higher rates of net primary productivity.
“Some experimental evidence suggests that greater plant species or functional group richness can foster higher rates of net primary productivity (Hector et al. 1999, Tilman et al. 2001), but the mechanisms underlying this response are not well understood, nor are they fully resolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hector et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tilman et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMany of the responses observed could be explained by greater plant production associated with higher plant diversity, which is likely to result from niche complementarity, positive interactions, and greater resource capture in the most species-rich experimental plant communities.
“Many of the responses that we observed could be explained by greater plant production (i.e., detritus production) associated with higher levels plant diversity, which are likely to result from niche complementarity, positive interactions, and greater resource capture in the most species-rich experimental plant communities (Tilman et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tilman et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataChanges in microbial community composition and function cannot be attributed to the occurrence of a particular plant functional group or the presence of a particular plant species.
“Thus, we cannot attribute changes in microbial community composition and function to the occurrence of a particular plant functional group, nor can we attribute these changes to the presence of a particular plant species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling.
“Heterotrophic microbial communities inhabiting soil mediate key processes that control ecosystem carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling, and they potentially represent a mechanistic link between plant diversity and ecosystem function.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Plant species differ in their biochemical composition.
“Because plant species differ in their biochemical composition, changes in plant diversity could alter the production, as well as the range, of organic compounds in detritus that limit, and thus control, the composition and function of heterotrophic microbial communities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effect of plant species richness on heterotrophic microbial communities would be most apparent in soil containing relatively low initial quantities of growth-limiting organic substrates (organic matter).
“We reasoned that the effect of plant species richness on heterotrophic microbial communities would be most apparent in soil containing relatively low initial quantities of growth-limiting organic substrates (i.e., organic matter).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The underlying relationships between plant diversity and soil carbon storage, soil microbial biomass and activity, and root biomass have been reported in several independent experimental settings, providing some evidence that the proposed links are of general significance.
“Although we cannot rule out that the proposed mechanisms are particularly pronounced at the field site of The Jena Experiment, the underlying relationships between plant diversity and soil carbon storage 17,24 , soil microbial biomass and activity 37,45,46 , and root biomass 24,47 have been reported in several independent experimental settings providing some evidence that the proposed links are of”
From Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
Fine root carbon is a measure of carbon input and basal respiration is a measure of microbial metabolic activity, and both were included as variables potentially mediating plant community effects.
“As variables potentially mediating plant community effects we included fine root carbon as measure of carbon input 31,32 and basal respiration as measure of microbial metabolic activity 20,34,37 .”
From Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Plant N ANOVA has conflicting degrees of freedom
MinorThe results and Fig. 6 give different residual degrees of freedom for the same plant N comparison, while reporting the same F statistic.
“We observed that total plant N content increased significantly from the 1-to 16-species treatments (F ϭ 25.10, df ϭ 4, 111; P Ͻ 0.001)”
“in the 16-species treatment (ANOVA, F ϭ 25.10, df ϭ 4, 115, P Ͻ 0.001)”
Immobilization ANOVA degrees of freedom conflict with sample count
MinorA one-way ANOVA across five treatments using the stated 116 sampled plots would have 111 residual degrees of freedom, not 115. Both immobilization tests report 115.
“plant diversity had no effect on the microbial assimilation of NH 4 ϩ (ANOVA; F ϭ 0.67, df ϭ 4, 115; P ϭ 0.614) or NO 3 Ϫ (ANOVA; F ϭ 0.85, df ϭ 4, 115; P ϭ 0.497)”
“In July 2000, we sampled 116 of these 168 plots, which provided the following levels of replication: n ϭ 39 for the 1-species treatment; n ϭ 24 for the 2-species treatment; n ϭ 12 for the 4-species treatment; n ϭ 12 for the 8-species treatment; n ϭ 29 for the 16-species treatment.”
Cites
A RAPID METHOD OF TOTAL LIPID EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION
Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J. (1959) · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1139/o59-099 · Cited by 54,751 · see citing works
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J. P., Hector, A., Hooper, D. U., Huston, M. A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064088 · Cited by 4,649 · see citing works
Self-citationResource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,255 · see citing works
Self-citationPartitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528 · see citing works
The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes
Tilman, D. G., Knops, J. M. H., Wedin, D. A., Reich, P. B., Ritchie, M. E., & Siemann, E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 · Cited by 3,205 · see citing works
Self-citationProductivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803 · see citing works
Self-citationMethods of soil analysis. Part 2 — Microbiological and biochemical properties
van Elsas, J. D. (1995) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/0304-4238(95)90023-3 · Cited by 2,639 · see citing works
Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060391 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
Self-citationPimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., & Brooks, T. M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · Cited by 2,230 · see citing works
Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands
Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Finn, J. A., Freitas, H., Giller, P. S., Good, J., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5442.1123 · Cited by 2,125 · see citing works
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,755 · see citing works
Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate
White, D. C., Davis, W. M., Nickels, J. S., King, J. D., & Bobbie, R. J. (1979) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00388810 · Cited by 1,702 · see citing works
Self-citationSecondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The availability of growth-limiting resources shapes the composition of biotic communities (Tilman 1982, 1987), and resource availability for soil microbial communities is constrained by organic compounds in dead leaves and roots (i.e., detritus) that can be used to generate cellular energy (Smith…”
BackgroundSelf-citationNitrogen Mineralization, Immobilization, and Nitrification
Hart, S. C., Stark, J. M., Davidson, E. A., & Firestone, M. K. (1994) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c42 · Cited by 1,075 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF PLANT COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY ON NUTRIENT CYCLING
Hooper, D. U., & Vitousek, P. M. (1998) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0121:eopcad]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., & Nicholson, K. S. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546010 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
The Significance of Soil Microbial Biomass Estimations
Smith, J. L., & Paul, E. A. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203739389-7 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., Barker, G. M., Yeates, G. W., Nicholson, K. S., Bardgett, R. D., Watson, R. N., & Ghani, A. (1999) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0535:pripgv]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Plant Production and Soil Microorganisms in Late‐Successional Ecosystems: A Continental‐Scale Study
Zak, D. R., Tilman, D. G., Parmenter, R., Rice, C. W., Fisher, F. M., Vose, J. M., Milchunas, D. G., & Martin, C. W. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940888 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Self-citationBardgett, R. D., & Shine, A. (1999) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(98)00121-7 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Plant diversity affects culturable soil bacteria in experimental grassland communities
Stephan, A., Meyer, A. H., & Schmid, B. (2000) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00510.x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Zak, D. R., Holmes, W. E., MacDonald, N. W., & Pregitzer, K. S. (1999) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300030021x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Self-citationCarbon and nitrogen cycling during old-field succession: Constraints on plant and microbial biomass
Zak, D. R., Grigal, D. F., Gleeson, S. K., & Tilman, D. G. (1990) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00002062 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrobial diversity, producer–decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model
Loreau, M. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1366 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Caldeira, M. C., Ryel, R. J., Lawton, J. H., & Pereira, J. S. (2001) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00238.x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Sensitive assay of phospholipid glycerol in environmental samples
Gehron, M. J., & White David, C. (1983) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/0167-7012(83)90004-0 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Ringelberg, D. B., Townsend, G. T., DeWeerd, K. A., Suflita, J. M., & White, D. (1994) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.1994.tb00085.x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Climates of the long-term ecological research sites
Greenland, D. (1987) · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046 · see citing works
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053 · see citing works
MICROBIAL STRESS-RESPONSE PHYSIOLOGY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
Schimel, J. P., Balser, T. C., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-0219 · Cited by 3,055 · see citing works
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J. Z., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773 · see citing works
Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage
Lange, M., Eisenhauer, N., Sierra, C. A., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Griffiths, R. I., Mellado-Vázquez, P. G., Malik, A. A., Roy, J., Scheu, S., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7707 · Cited by 1,742 · see citing works
Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility
Chaparro, J. M., Sheflin, A. M., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2012) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-012-0691-4 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration
Spokas, K. A., Cantrell, K. B., Novak, J. M., Archer, D. W., Ippolito, J. A., Collins, H. P., Boateng, A. A., Lima, I. M., Lamb, M. C., McAloon, A. J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0069 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Jing, X., Sanders, N. J., Shi, Y., Chu, H., Classen, A. T., Zhao, K., Chen, L., Shi, Y., Jiang, Y., & He, J.-S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9159 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review
Letourneau, D. K., Armbrecht, I., Rivera, B. S., Lerma, J. M., Carmona, E. J., Daza, M. C., Escobar, S., Galindo, V., Gutiérrez, C., López, S. D., et al. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/09-2026.1 · Cited by 888 · see citing works
FEEDBACK IN THE PLANT-SOIL SYSTEM
Ehrenfeld, J. G., Ravit, B., & Elgersma, K. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144212 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
The dimensions of soil security
McBratney, A. B., Field, D. J., & Koch, A. (2013) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
McDaniel, M. D., Tiemann, L. K., & Grandy, A. S. (2014) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/13-0616.1 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem
Tiemann, L. K., Grandy, A. S., Atkinson, E. E., Marín-Spiotta, E., & McDaniel, M. D. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12453 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Root Exudates Regulate Soil Fungal Community Composition and Diversity
Broeckling, C. D., Broz, A. K., Bergelson, J. M., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02188-07 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Soil pH Determines Microbial Diversity and Composition in the Park Grass Experiment
Zhalnina, K. V., Dias, R., de Quadros, P. D., Davis‐Richardson, A. G., Camargo, F. A. D. O., Clark, I. M., McGrath, S. P., Hirsch, P. R., & Triplett, E. W. (2014) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-014-0530-2 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Duchêne, O., Vian, J.-F., & Celette, F. (2017) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.019 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Wang, C., Liu, D., & Bai, E. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.003 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Biophysical processes supporting the diversity of microbial life in soil
Tecon, R., & Or, D. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux039 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects
Fargione, J., & Tilman, D. G. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00753.x · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Self-citationPlant diversity effects on soil microorganisms support the singular hypothesis
Eisenhauer, N., Beßler, H., Engels, C., Gleixner, G., Habekost, M., Milcu, A., Partsch, S., Sabais, A. C. W., Scherber, C., Steinbeiss, S., et al. (2010) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-2338.1 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY MANIPULATIONS IN EUROPEAN GRASSLANDS
Spehn, E. M., Hector, A., Joshi, J., Scherer‐Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Bazeley‐White, E., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M. W., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/03-4101 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Weisser, W. W., Roscher, C., Meyer, S. T., Ebeling, A., Luo, G., Allan, E., Beßler, H., Barnard, R. L., Buchmann, N., Buscot, F., et al. (2017) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2017.06.002 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Breaking New Ground: Soil Communities and Exotic Plant Invasion
Wolfe, B. E., & Klironomos, J. N. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0477:bngsca]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
The impact of crop rotation on soil microbial diversity: A meta-analysis
Venter, Z. S., Jacobs, K., & Hawkins, H. (2016) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.001 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration
Chen, C., Chen, H. Y. H., Chen, X., & Huang, Z. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09258-y · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance
Ferrenberg, S. M., O’Neill, S., Knelman, J. E., Todd, B. T.-L., Duggan, S. B., Bradley, D., Robinson, T., Schmidt, S. K., Townsend, A. R., Williams, M. W., et al. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.11 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Eco-functionality of organic matter in soils
Hoffland, E., Kuyper, T. W., Comans, R. N. J., & Creamer, R. (2020) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-020-04651-9 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Resource availability controls fungal diversity across a plant diversity gradient
Waldrop, M. P., Zak, D. R., Blackwood, C. B., Curtis, C. D., & Tilman, D. G. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00965.x · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationA trait‐based approach for modelling microbial litter decomposition
Allison, S. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01807.x · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Rasche, F., Knapp, D., Kaiser, C., Koranda, M., Kitzler, B., Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S., Richter, A. A., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.138 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Näther, A., Foesel, B. U., Naegele, V., Wüst, P. K., Weinert, J., Bonkowski, M., Alt, F., Oelmann, Y., Polle, A., Lohaus, G., et al. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01325-12 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Udawatta, R. P., Rankoth, L. M., & Jose, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11102879 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Chaudhry, V., Rehman, A., Mishra, A., Chauhan, P. S., & Nautiyal, C. S. (2012) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-012-0025-y · Cited by 361 · see citing works
VARIATION IN DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER CONTROLS BACTERIAL PRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
Judd, K. E., Crump, B. C., & Kling, G. W. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2068:vidomc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Root exudate cocktails: the link between plant diversity and soil microorganisms?
Steinauer, K., Chatzinotas, A., & Eisenhauer, N. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2454 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
The microbial PLFA composition as affected by pH in an arable soil
Rousk, J., Brookes, P. C., & Bååth, E. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.026 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Bouskill, N., Lim, H. C., Borglin, S. E., Salve, R., Wood, T. E., Silver, W. L., & Brodie, E. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.113 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Xu, T., Veresoglou, S. D., Hu, H., Hao, Z., Hu, Y., Liu, L., Deng, Y., Rillig, M. C., & Chen, B. (2017) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.02.015 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Möller, K. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0284-3 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity
Jose, S. (2012) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-012-9517-5 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Determinants of Species Richness in the Park Grass Experiment
Crawley, M. J., Johnston, A. E., SILVERTOWN, J. W., Dodd, M., de Mazancourt, C., Heard, M. S., Henman, D. F., & Edwards, G. R. (2005) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/427270 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Nemergut, D. R., Townsend, A. R., Sattin, S. R., Freeman, K. R., Fierer, N., Neff, J. C., Bowman, W. D., Schadt, C. W., Weintraub, M. N., & Schmidt, S. K. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01735.x · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Cruz-Martínez, K., Suttle, K. B., Brodie, E., Power, M. E., Andersen, G. L., & Banfield, J. F. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.16 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Determinants of bacterial communities in C anadian agroforestry systems
Banerjee, S., Baah‐Acheamfour, M., Carlyle, C. N., Bissett, A. B., Richardson, A. E., Siddique, T., Bork, E. W., & Chang, S. X. (2015) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12986 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Crop rotational diversity increases disease suppressive capacity of soil microbiomes
Peralta, A. L., Sun, Y., McDaniel, M. D., & Lennon, J. T. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2235 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Effects of past and current drought on the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities
Preece, C., Verbruggen, E., Liu, L., Weedon, J. T., & Peñuelas, J. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.022 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Alpha-, beta-, and gamma-diversity of bacteria varies across habitats
Walters, K. E., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233872 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Valencia, E., Maestre, F. T., Bagousse‐Pinguet, Y. L., Quero, J. L., Tamme, R., Börger, L., García‐Gómez, M., & Gross, N. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13268 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Plant community richness and microbial interactions structure bacterial communities in soil
Schlatter, D., Bakker, M. G., Bradeen, J. M., & Kinkel, L. L. (2014) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/13-1648.1 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Dassen, S., Cortois, R., Martens, H., de Hollander, M., Kowalchuk, G. A., van der Putten, W. H., & Deyn, G. B. D. (2017) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14175 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Chung, H., Zak, D. R., Reich, P. B., & Ellsworth, D. S. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01313.x · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil feedbacks of plant diversity on soil microbial communities and subsequent plant growth
Bartelt-Ryser, J., Joshi, J., Schmid, B., Brandl, H., & Balser, T. C. (2005) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2004.11.002 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Bell, C., Acosta‐Martínez, V., McIntyre, N. E., Cox, S. B., Tissue, D. T., & Zak, J. C. (2009) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-009-9529-5 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Bell, C., Carrillo, Y., Boot, C. M., Rocca, J. D., Pendall, E. G., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12531 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Plant biodiversity and the regeneration of soil fertility
Furey, G. N., & Tilman, D. G. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2111321118 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationChao, Y., Liu, W.-S., Chen, Y.-M., Chen, W.-H., Zhao, L., Ding, Q., Wang, S.-Z., Tang, Y.-T., Zhang, T., & Qiu, R.-L. (2016) · Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02284 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Crop rotation complexity regulates the decomposition of high and low quality residues
McDaniel, M. D., Grandy, A. S., Tiemann, L. K., & Weintraub, M. N. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.07.027 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Coyle, D. R., Nagendra, U. J., Taylor, M. K., Campbell, J. H., Cunard, C. E., Joslin, A. H., Mundepi, A., Phillips, C. A., & Callaham, M. A. (2017) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.008 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: a quantitative analysis
Cleveland, C. C., Reed, S. C., Keller, A. B., Nemergut, D. R., O’Neill, S., Ostertag, R., & Vitousek, P. M. (2013) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2758-9 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Latz, E., Eisenhauer, N., Rall, B. C., Allan, E., Roscher, C., Scheu, S., & Jousset, A. (2012) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01940.x · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Eisenhauer, N., Milcu, A., Sabais, A. C. W., Beßler, H., Brenner, J., Engels, C., Klarner, B., Maraun, M., Partsch, S., Roscher, C., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016055 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Integrating Soil Ecological Knowledge into Restoration Management
Heneghan, L., Miller, S. P., Baer, S. G., Callaham, M. A., Montgomery, J. A., Pavao‐Zuckerman, M. A., Rhoades, C. C., & Richardson, S. (2008) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00477.x · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Bezemer, Т. M., Fountain, M. T., Barea, J. M., Christensen, S. T., Dekker, S. C., Duyts, H., van Hal, R., Harvey, J. A., Hedlund, K., Maraun, M., et al. (2010) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/09-2198.1 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Response of the Soil Microbial Community to Changes in Precipitation in a Semiarid Ecosystem
Cregger, M. A., Schadt, C. W., McDowell, N. G., Pockman, W. T., & Classen, A. T. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02050-12 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Tree Species Effects on Soil Organic Matter Dynamics: The Role of Soil Cation Composition
Hobbie, S. E., Ogdahl, M. L., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O. A., Oleksyn, J., Żytkowiak, R., & Reich, P. B. (2007) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9073-4 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Direct and cascading impacts of tropical land-use change on multi-trophic biodiversity
Barnes, A. D., Allen, K., Kreft, H., Corre, M. D., Jochum, M., Veldkamp, E., Clough, Y., Daniel, R., Darras, K., Denmead, L. H., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0275-7 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Living cover crops have immediate impacts on soil microbial community structure and function
Finney, D. M., Buyer, J. S., & Kaye, J. P. (2017) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.72.4.361 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Lange, M., Habekost, M., Eisenhauer, N., Roscher, C., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Oelmann, Y., Scheu, S., Wilcke, W., Schulze, E.-D., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096182 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Does grassland vegetation drive soil microbial diversity?
Millard, P., & Singh, B. K. (2009) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-009-9314-3 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Cline, L. C., & Zak, D. R. (2015) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/15-0184.1 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationPlant biodiversity promotes sustainable agriculture directly and via belowground effects
Cappelli, S. L., Domeignoz‐Horta, L. A., Loaiza, V., & Laine, A. (2022) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.02.003 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Xue, L., Ren, H., Li, S., Leng, X., & Yao, X. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02377 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Reforestation accelerates soil organic carbon accumulation: Evidence from microbial biomarkers
Shao, P., Liang, C. C., Lynch, L., Xie, H., & Bao, X. (2019) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.012 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Benbow, M. E., Barton, P. S., Ulyshen, M. D., Beasley, J. C., DeVault, T. L., Strickland, M. S., Tomberlin, J. K., Jordan, H. R., & Pechal, J. L. (2018) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1331 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Steinauer, K., Tilman, D. G., Wragg, P. D., Cesarz, S., Cowles, J., Pritsch, K., Reich, P. B., Weisser, W. W., & Eisenhauer, N. (2014) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/14-0088.1 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrating ecosystem functions into restoration ecology—recent advances and future directions
Kollmann, J., Meyer, S. T., Bateman, R., Conradi, T., Goßner, M. M., Mendonça, M. D. S., Fernandes, G. W., Hermann, J., Koch, C., Müller, S. C., et al. (2016) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12422 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Nitrification is linked to dominant leaf traits rather than functional diversity
Laughlin, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01856.x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Fu, B., Zheng, X., & Liu, G. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.027 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Wang, R., Dorodnikov, M., Yang, S. L., Zhang, Y., Filley, T. R., Turco, R. F., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Li, H., & Jiang, Y. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.015 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Carney, K. M., & Matson, P. A. (2005) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0047-0 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Hu, Y., Xiang, D., Veresoglou, S. D., Chen, F., Chen, Y., Hao, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, B. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.014 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Climate and litter C/N ratio constrain soil organic carbon accumulation
Zhou, G., Xu, S. H., Ciais, P., Manzoni, S., Fang, J., Yu, G., Tang, X., Zhou, P., Wang, W., Yan, J., et al. (2019) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz045 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Effects of plant species richness and evenness on soil microbial community diversity and function
Lamb, E. G., Kennedy, N. M., & Siciliano, S. D. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0560-6 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Gutknecht, J., Field, C. B., & Balser, T. C. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02686.x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Metcalfe, D. B., Fisher, R. A., & Wardle, D. A. (2011) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-8-2047-2011 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Fanin, N., & Bertrand, I. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.007 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Patterns of fungal diversity and composition along a salinity gradient
Mohamed, D. J., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.137 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Thakur, M. P., Milcu, A., Manning, P., Niklaus, P. A., Roscher, C., Power, S. A., Reich, P. B., Scheu, S., Tilman, D. G., Ai, F., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13011 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationCulman, S. W., DuPont, S. T., Glover, J. D., Buckley, D. H., Fick, G. W., Ferris, H. A., & Crews, T. E. (2009) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.008 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Fornara, D. A., Tilman, D. G., & Hobbie, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01453.x · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationFornara, D. A., & Tilman, D. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-0325.1 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationDisease-Suppressive Soils—Beyond Food Production: a Critical Review
Jayaraman, S., Naorem, A., Lal, R., Dalal, R., Sinha, N., Patra, A., & Chaudhari, S. (2021) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.1007/s42729-021-00451-x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Enhancing diversity of species‐poor grasslands: an experimental assessment of multiple constraints
Pywell, R. F., Bullock, J. M., Tallowin, J., Walker, K. J., WARMAN, E. A., & Masters, G. J. (2006) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01260.x · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Chemical biomarkers in aquatic ecosystems
Bianchi, T. S., & Canuel, E. A. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-0862 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Smith, A. P., Marín-Spiotta, E., & Balser, T. C. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12947 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Agriculture's impact on microbial diversity and associated fluxes of carbon dioxide and methane
Levine, U. Y., Teal, T. K., Robertson, G. P., & Schmidt, T. M. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.40 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Kumar, U., Nayak, A. K., Shahid, M., Gupta, V. V. S. R., Panneerselvam, P., Mohanty, S., Kaviraj, M., Kumar, A., Chatterjee, D., Lal, B., et al. (2018) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.016 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Arnosti, C., Bell, C., Moorhead, D., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Steen, A. D., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., & Weintraub, M. N. (2013) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-013-9906-5 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal microbial community dynamics within soil aggregates
Upton, R. N., Bach, E. M., & Hofmockel, K. (2019) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.016 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zak, D. R., Holmes, W. E., White, D. C., Peacock, A. D., & Tilman, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zak, Donald R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2042-2050
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097385742
- Semantic Scholar
- 85563ba6cdfe3994601a05877c729295936b99d8
- Cited by
- 1,257
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 24.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- U.S. Forest Service
- Biological and Environmental Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- plant diversity, soil microbial communities, plant species richness, ecosystem functioning, nitrogen mineralization, plant production, nitrogen cycling, plant-microbe interactions, soil microbial biomass, soil respiration, fungal abundance, nitrogen limitation, biodiversity-productivity relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review