CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 227Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipReligion, Ecology, and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Spirituality and Religiosity Resources for Patients with Chronic Pain Conditions?

Büssing, Arndt, Michalsen, Andreas, Balzat, Hans-Joachim, Grünther, Ralf-Achim, Ostermann, Thomas, Neugebauer, Edmund A. M., Matthiessen, Peter F.·2009·Pain Medicine
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00572.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied whether or not spirituality/religiosity is a relevant resource for patients with chronic pain conditions, and to analyze interrelations between spirituality/religiosity (SpREUK Questionnaire; SpREUK is an acronym of the German translation of "Spiritual and Religious Attitudes in Dealing with Illness"), adaptive coping styles that refer to the concept of locus of disease control (AKU Questionnaire; AKU is an acronym of the German translation of "Adaptive Coping with Disease"), life satisfaction, and appraisal dimensions. PATIENTS: In a multicenter cross-sectional study, 580 patients with chronic pain conditions were enrolled. RESULTS: We found that the patients relied on both external powerful sources of disease control and on internal powers and virtues, while Trust in Higher Source (intrinsic religiosity) or Illness as Chance (reappraisal) were valued moderately; Search for Meaningful Support/Access (spiritual quest orientation) was of minor relevance. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that the internal sources of disease control, such as Conscious and Healthy Way of Living and Positive Attitudes, were (apart from the religious denomination) the strongest predictors of patients' reliance on spirituality/religiosity. Both behavioral styles were rated significantly lower in patients who regarded themselves as neither religious nor spiritual. Positive disease interpretations such as Challenge and Value were clearly associated with a spiritual quest orientation and intrinsic religiosity. CONCLUSION: The associations between spirituality/religiosity, positive appraisals. and internal adaptive coping strategies indicate that the utilization of spirituality/religiosity goes far beyond fatalistic acceptance, but can be regarded as an active coping process. The findings support the need for further research concerning the contributions of spiritual coping in adjustment to chronic pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00572.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1345/aph.10215 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Koenig HG . Integrating spirituality into medical practice: A new era in medicine. In: Büssing A Ostermann T Glöckler M Matthiessen PF , eds. Spiritualität, Krankheit und Heilung—Bedeutung und Ausdrucksformen der Spiritualität in der Medizin. Frankfurt: VAS-Verlag für Akademische Schriften; 2006:232–41.
  3. Kotur, 2006, Pain management by psychosocial and spiritual methods, Indian J Anaesth, 50, 327

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 227

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Büssing, A., Michalsen, A., Balzat, H.-J., Grünther, R.-A., Ostermann, T., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Matthiessen, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Herdecke (DE)
  • Athens Orthopedic Clinic (US)
ORCID
Venue
Pain Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2009-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
327-339
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00572.x
OpenAlex
W2076332949
Cited by
227
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 2375 d)
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Keywords
spirituality, religiosity, chronic pain, adaptive coping, locus of control, illness appraisal, spiritual coping, life satisfaction, intrinsic religiosity, coping with illness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spiritualism, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review