Cited by 259Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers and Facilitators to Chronic Pain Self-Management: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Patients with Comorbid Musculoskeletal Pain and Depression

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic musculoskeletal pain among patients with comorbid pain and depression. DESIGN: A qualitative study using focus group methodology. SETTING: Veteran Affairs (VA) and University primary care clinics. PATIENTS: Recruited after participation in a clinical trial. INTERVENTION: The Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) trial tested an intervention of optimized antidepressant therapy combined with a pain self-management program versus usual care for primary care patients with comorbid chronic pain and depression. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thematic content analysis from focus group data was used to identify patient-perceived barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: Patients (N = 18) were 27 to 84 years old (M = 54.8), 61% women, 72% white, and 22% black. Barriers to pain self-management included: 1) lack of support from friends and family; 2) limited resources (e.g., transportation, financial); 3) depression; 4) ineffectiveness of pain-relief strategies; 5) time constraints and other life priorities; 6) avoiding activity because of fear of pain exacerbation; 7) lack of tailoring strategies to meet personal needs; 8) not being able to maintain the use of strategies after study completion; 9) physical limitations; and 10) difficult patient-physician interactions. Facilitators to improve pain self-management included 1) encouragement from nurse care managers; 2) improving depression with treatment; 3) supportive family and friends; and 4) providing a menu of different self-management strategies to use. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to confirm these findings and to design interventions that capitalize on the facilitators identified while at the same time addressing the barriers to pain self-management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00707.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Turk DC Okifuji A Kalauolalani D . Clinical outcome and economic evaluation of multidisciplinary pain centers. In: Block AR Kremer EF Fernandez E , eds. Handbook of Pain Syndromes: Biopsychosocial Perspectives. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999:77–98.
  2. Von Korff M . Perspectives on Management of Back Pain in Primary Care. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1994.
  3. Institute of Medicine: Committee on Identifying Priority Areas for Quality Improvement. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming: Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
  4. Crabtree BF Miller WL . Research practice settings: A case study approach. In: Crabtree BF Miller WL , eds. Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999:293–312.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Bair, M. J., Matthias, M. S., Nyland, K. A., Huffman, M. A., Stubbs, D. L., Kroenke, K., & Damush, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Bair, Matthew J.
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2009-10
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1280-1290
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W1986073191
Cited by
259
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 071268, R01MH071268)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
musculoskeletal pain, depression, comorbidities, barriers and facilitators, primary care patients, patient support, family support, nurse care managers, patient-physician interaction, fear-avoidance beliefs, antidepressant treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Indiana, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Primary Health Care, Self Care, Comorbidity, Arthralgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review