The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Placebo‐Controlled Pilot Study of Centromedian Thalamic Stimulation in Treatment of Intractable Seizures
Abstract
Summary: Stimulation of centromedian (CM) thalamic nuclei has been proposed as a treatment for seizures. We implanted programmable subcutaneous (s.c.) stimulators into CM bilaterally in 7 patients with intractable epilepsy to test feasibility and safety. Stimulation was on or off in 3‐month blocks, with a 3‐month washout period in a double‐blind, cross‐over protocol. Stimuli were delivered as 9O‐μs pulses at 65 pulses/s, 1 min of each 5 min for 2 h/day, with voltage set to half the sensory threshold. Stimulation was safe and well‐tolerated, with a mean reduction of tonic‐clonic seizure frequency of 30% with respect to baseline when stimulator was on versus a decrease of 8% when the stimulator was off. There was no improvement in total number of generalized seizures with stimulation, and treatment differences were not statistically significant. Stimulation at low intensity did not alter the EEG acutely, but high‐intensity stimulation induced slow waves or 2–3 Hz spike‐waves with ipsilateral frontal maximum. In an open‐label follow‐up segment with stimulator trains continuing for 24 h/day, 3 of 6 patients reported at least a 50% decrease in seizure frequency. There were no side effects. This pilot project demonstrated the feasibility of controlled study of thalamic stimulation in epilepsy, but further study will be needed to demonstrate efficacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parameters for direct cortical electrical stimulation in the human: histopathologic confirmation
Gordon, B., Lesser, R. P., Rance, N. E., Hart, J., Webber, R., Uematsu, S., & Fisher, R. S. (1990) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(90)90082-u · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Cited by
Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy
Fisher, R., Salanova, V., Witt, T., Worth, R., Henry, T., Gross, R., Oommen, K., Osorio, I., Nazzaro, J., Labar, D., et al. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationElectrical brain stimulation for epilepsy
Fisher, R. S., & Velasco, A. L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.59 · Cited by 402
Self-citationEpileptic seizure prediction and control
Iasemidis, L. D. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.810705 · Cited by 363
Deep brain stimulation in epilepsy with particular reference to the subthalamic nucleus
Chabardès, S., Kahane, P., Minotti, L., Koudsie, A., Hirsch, E., & Benabid, A. (2002) · Epileptic Disorders · doi:10.1684/j.1950-6945.2002.tb00549.x · Cited by 304
Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy: a review
McLachlan, R. S. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/00004691-199709000-00002 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, R. S., Uematsu, S., Krauss, G. L., Cysyk, B. J., McPherson, R., Lesser, R. P., Gordon, B., Schwerdt, P., & Rise, M.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 841-851
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W1966617461
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placebo‐Controlled Pilot Study of Centromedian Thalamic Stimulation in Treatment of Intractable Seizures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb02192.x
- The paper
- Fisher, R. S., Uematsu, S., Krauss, G. L., Cysyk, B. J., McPherson, R., Lesser, R. P., Gordon, B., Schwerdt, P., & Rise, M. (1992). Placebo‐Controlled Pilot Study of Centromedian Thalamic Stimulation in Treatment of Intractable Seizures. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb02192.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.