Cited by 103Epilepsy research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

Differential susceptibility to seizures induced by systemic kainic acid treatment in mature DBA/2J and C57BLl6J mice

Ferraro, Thomas N., Golden, Gregory T., Smith, George G., Berrettini, Wade H.·1995·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Mature DBA/2J (D2) and C57BL/6J (B6) mice aged P.10 weeks were studied to determine susceptibility to behavioral seizures induced by kainic acid (KA) and the possible influence exerted by differences in metabolism and blood‐brain barrier (BBB) transport. Mice were observed for 4 h after subcutaneous (s.c.) KA injection. Behavioral seizure parameters included latency to first seizure (clonus), latency to tonic/clonic seizure, and latency to status epilepticus (SE). At a KA dose of 25 mg/kg, 80% of D2 mice exhibited tonicklonic seizures, whereas all B6 mice remained seizure‐free. At 30 mg/kg, tonic/ clonic seizures were observed in 100% of D2 mice and 25% of B6 mice. Of D2 mice exhibiting at least one clonic seizure in response to KA at a dose of 25 mg/kg, 50% entered SE and eventually died. Administration of [3 H]KA (6.6 × 10 6 dpm) at doses of 25 mg/kg (convulsive) or 11.1 μ/g (nonconvulsive) to mice of both strains resulted in similar levels of radioactivity in cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum 30 and 60 min after injection. Bioconversion of [3 H]KA to a radiolabeled brain metabolite in vivo could not be documented in mice from either strain. Results confirm previously reported differences between D2 and B6 mice in their relative susceptibility to seizures induced by systemic KA administration and suggest that these differences are not related to strain‐specific variation in metabolism or BBB transport of KA. Further studies of these two strains of mice may be useful for investigating genetic influences upon seizure susceptibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00999.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferraro, T. N., Golden, G. T., Smith, G. G., & Berrettini, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ferraro, Thomas N.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
301-307
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1980584574
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Keywords
kainic acid, seizure susceptibility, DBA/2J mice, C57BL/6J mice, status epilepticus, tonic-clonic seizures, blood-brain barrier transport, genetic predisposition to epilepsy, strain differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Kainic Acid, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Seizures, Species Specificity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review