Cited by 82Epilepsy research and treatmentNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Cardiac and Respiratory Correlations with Unit Discharge in Epileptic Human Temporal Lobe

Frysinger, Robert C., Harper, Ronald M.·1990·Epilepsia

Abstract

We recorded respiratory activity and electrocardiogram (ECG) together with single cell activity from the amygdala and hippocampus of epileptic patients who later received anterotemporal lobectomy. Cross-correlation histograms were used to test for neuronal discharge timing relationships with inspiration or ECG. Linear regression was used to test for correlations of inspiratory time, respiratory period, and heart rate (HR) with tonic unit rate for each breath. Of 129 cells from 16 patients who later had resection, 89 were contralateral and 40 were ipsilateral to the resected lobe. Of the contralateral cells, 19% had a timing relationship with the cardiac cycle and only 1% had such a relationship with the respiratory cycle. Tonic correlations with HR were noted in 22% and with respiratory period and inspiratory time in 11 and 6%. Neither these percentages nor mean discharge rate differed between structures, although variance in rate was much higher on the resected side. Amygdala cells on the resected side showed more correlations with the cardiac cycle (55 vs. 20%), respiratory period (46 vs. 3%), and inspiratory time (27 vs. 7%) and were more likely to show several types of correlation. The results suggest a selective loss of ipsilateral amygdala cells and/or afferents, favoring relationships with cardiac- and respiratory-related systems and a possible synaptic reorganization of remaining cardiorespiratory afferents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.1990.tb06301.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The involvement of large portions of the limbic system (amygdala, hippocampus, insula, cingulate) is confirmed in human intra-cranial recordings.

    “The involvement of large portions of the limbic system (amygdala, hippocampus, insula, cingulate) is confirmed in human intra-cranial recordings 136,137 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [136]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frysinger, R. C., & Harper, R. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Frysinger, Robert C.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
162-171
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1994937342
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS02808-26)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
amygdala, hippocampus, unit discharge, cardiorespiratory coupling, heart rate, respiratory cycle, inspiratory time, synaptic remodeling, cross-correlation histograms, single-unit recording, seizure outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular System, Electrophysiology, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Humans, Functional Laterality, Neurons, Respiration, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review