Cited by 338Neuroscience of respiration and sleepHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Breathing above the brain stem: volitional control and attentional modulation in humans

Open access
Herrero, Jose L., Khuvis, Simon, Yeagle, Erin, Cerf, Moran, Mehta, Ashesh D.·2018·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Whereas the neurophysiology of respiration has traditionally focused on automatic brain stem processes, higher brain mechanisms underlying the cognitive aspects of breathing are gaining increasing interest. Therapeutic techniques have used conscious control and awareness of breathing for millennia with little understanding of the mechanisms underlying their efficacy. Using direct intracranial recordings in humans, we correlated cortical and limbic neuronal activity as measured by the intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) with the breathing cycle. We show this to be the direct result of neuronal activity, as demonstrated by both the specificity of the finding to the cortical gray matter and the tracking of breath by the gamma-band (40–150 Hz) envelope in these structures. We extend prior observations by showing the iEEG signal to track the breathing cycle across a widespread network of cortical and limbic structures. We further demonstrate a sensitivity of this tracking to cognitive factors by using tasks adapted from cognitive behavioral therapy and meditative practice. Specifically, volitional control and awareness of breathing engage distinct but overlapping brain circuits. During volitionally paced breathing, iEEG-breath coherence increases in a frontotemporal-insular network, and during attention to breathing, we demonstrate increased coherence in the anterior cingulate, premotor, insular, and hippocampal cortices. Our findings suggest that breathing can act as an organizing hierarchical principle for neuronal oscillations throughout the brain and detail mechanisms of how cognitive factors impact otherwise automatic neuronal processes during interoceptive attention. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Whereas the link between breathing and brain activity has a long history of application to therapy, its neurophysiology remains unexplored. Using intracranial recordings in humans, we show neuronal activity to track the breathing cycle throughout widespread cortical/limbic sites. Volitional pacing of the breath engages frontotemporal-insular cortices, whereas attention to automatic breathing modulates the cingulate cortex. Our findings imply a fundamental role of breathing-related oscillations in driving neuronal activity and provide insight into the neuronal mechanisms of interoceptive attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00551.2017

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voluntary breathing might not be essential to realize the basic physiological benefits of slow breathing techniques; spontaneous slow breathing without cognitive motor intent may be sufficient.

    “However, there is also evidence that voluntary breathing might not be essential to realize the basic physiological benefits of these techniques; spontaneous slow breathing without cognitive motor intent may be sufficient (Hirsch and Bishop, 1981; Herrero et al., 2018).”

    From Hypothesis: Pulmonary Afferent Activity Patterns During Slow, Deep Breathing Contribute to the Neural Induction of Physiological Relaxation (2019) · cites this paper as Herrero et al., 2018

    The Experimental tasks section (page unavailable) defines natural breathing as spontaneous breathing without a cognitive task. The Synchronization of neuronal activity section (page unavailable) reports that brain oscillations continued to track breathing when subjects returned to their slower natural rate. The paper does not establish that spontaneous slow breathing provides the physiological benefits of slow-breathing techniques or that voluntary control is unnecessary for those benefits. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Coupling between respiration and neural activity has also been observed in motor regions in both rodents and humans.

    “Second, coupling between respiration and neural activity has also been observed in motor regions in both rodents 141 and humans 137 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [137]

  • The involvement of large portions of the limbic system (amygdala, hippocampus, insula, cingulate) is confirmed in human intra-cranial recordings.

    “The involvement of large portions of the limbic system (amygdala, hippocampus, insula, cingulate) is confirmed in human intra-cranial recordings 136,137 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [137]

  • Respiratory-related activity is observed in the somatosensory cortex, both in humans and in different parts of the rodent or cat somatosensory cortex: the whisker barrel cortex, trunk and nose representation.

    “First, respiratory-related activity is observed in the somatosensory cortex, both in humans 137,140 and in different parts of the rodent or cat somatosensory cortex: the whisker barrel cortex 118,141 , trunk 122,123 and nose 142 representation.”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [137]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrero, J. L., Khuvis, S., Yeagle, E., Cerf, M., & Mehta, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Mehta, Ashesh D.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
145-159
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2760226235
Cited by
338
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (NIH/NINDS U01 NS098976-01)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (NIH/NIMH R01 MH111439, NIMH 1R21MH114166-01)
  • Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) (LT000151/2012-L/6)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
breathing, respiration, brainstem, volitional control, interoceptive attention, intracranial EEG, gamma oscillations, neural oscillations, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, premotor cortex, cognitive behavioral therapy, meditation, intracranial recordings
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain Stem, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Respiration, Gamma Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review