Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Open access
Boon, Paul, Vonck, Kristl, De Herdt, Veerle, Van Dycke, Annelies, Goethals, Maarten, Goossens, Lut, Van Zandijcke, Michel, De Smedt, Tim, Dewaele, Isabelle, Achten, Rik, Wadman, Wytse, Dewaele, Frank, Caemaert, Jacques, Van Roost, Dirk·2007·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: This pilot study prospectively evaluated the efficacy of long‐term deep brain stimulation (DBS) in medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures in patients with MTL epilepsy. Methods: Twelve consecutive patients with refractory MTL epilepsy were included in this study. The protocol included invasive video‐EEG monitoring for ictal‐onset localization and evaluation for subsequent stimulation of the ictal‐onset zone. Side effects and changes in seizure frequency were carefully monitored. Results: Ten of 12 patients underwent long‐term MTL DBS. Two of 12 patients underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy. After mean follow‐up of 31 months (range, 12–52 months), one of 10 stimulated patients are seizure free (>1 year), one of 10 patients had a >90% reduction in seizure frequency; five of 10 patients had a seizure‐frequency reduction of ≥50%; two of 10 patients had a seizure‐frequency reduction of 30–49%; and one of 10 patients was a nonresponder. None of the patients reported side effects. In one patient, MRI showed asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages along the trajectory of the DBS electrodes. None of the patients showed changes in clinical neurological testing. Patients who underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy are seizure‐free (>1 year), AEDs are unchanged, and no side effects have occurred. Conclusions: This open pilot study demonstrates the potential efficacy of long‐term DBS in MTL structures that should now be further confirmed by multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01005.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 368

Metadata

Authors
Boon, P., Vonck, K., De Herdt, V., Van Dycke, A., Goethals, M., Goossens, L., Van Zandijcke, M., De Smedt, T., Dewaele, I., Achten, R., Wadman, W., Dewaele, F., Caemaert, J., & Van Roost, D.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-22
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
1551-1560
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2135210312
Cited by
368
References
2
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01005.x
The paper
Boon, P., Vonck, K., De Herdt, V., Van Dycke, A., Goethals, M., Goossens, L., Van Zandijcke, M., De Smedt, T., Dewaele, I., Achten, R., Wadman, W., Dewaele, F., Caemaert, J., & Van Roost, D. (2007). Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01005.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.