The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Purpose: This pilot study prospectively evaluated the efficacy of long‐term deep brain stimulation (DBS) in medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures in patients with MTL epilepsy. Methods: Twelve consecutive patients with refractory MTL epilepsy were included in this study. The protocol included invasive video‐EEG monitoring for ictal‐onset localization and evaluation for subsequent stimulation of the ictal‐onset zone. Side effects and changes in seizure frequency were carefully monitored. Results: Ten of 12 patients underwent long‐term MTL DBS. Two of 12 patients underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy. After mean follow‐up of 31 months (range, 12–52 months), one of 10 stimulated patients are seizure free (>1 year), one of 10 patients had a >90% reduction in seizure frequency; five of 10 patients had a seizure‐frequency reduction of ≥50%; two of 10 patients had a seizure‐frequency reduction of 30–49%; and one of 10 patients was a nonresponder. None of the patients reported side effects. In one patient, MRI showed asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages along the trajectory of the DBS electrodes. None of the patients showed changes in clinical neurological testing. Patients who underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy are seizure‐free (>1 year), AEDs are unchanged, and no side effects have occurred. Conclusions: This open pilot study demonstrates the potential efficacy of long‐term DBS in MTL structures that should now be further confirmed by multicenter randomized controlled trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Vagus-nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy
Ben-Menachem, E. (2002) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00220-x · Cited by 560
Cited by
Memory Enhancement and Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Entorhinal Area
Suthana, N., Haneef, Z., Stern, J., Mukamel, R., Behnke, E., Knowlton, B., & Fried, I. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1107212 · Cited by 494
Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound
Tufail, Y., Yoshihiro, A., Pati, S., Li, M. M., & Tyler, W. J. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.371 · Cited by 473
Deep brain stimulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy
Li, M. C. H., & Cook, M. J. (2018) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13964 · Cited by 293
Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: A Brief Technical History and Review
Coffey, R. J. (2009) · Artificial Organs · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00620.x · Cited by 178
Giacobbe, P., Mayberg, H. S., & Lozano, A. M. (2009) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.04.028 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Boon, P., Vonck, K., De Herdt, V., Van Dycke, A., Goethals, M., Goossens, L., Van Zandijcke, M., De Smedt, T., Dewaele, I., Achten, R., Wadman, W., Dewaele, F., Caemaert, J., & Van Roost, D.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-22
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1551-1560
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2135210312
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01005.x
- The paper
- Boon, P., Vonck, K., De Herdt, V., Van Dycke, A., Goethals, M., Goossens, L., Van Zandijcke, M., De Smedt, T., Dewaele, I., Achten, R., Wadman, W., Dewaele, F., Caemaert, J., & Van Roost, D. (2007). Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01005.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.