The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adjunctive lacosamide for partial‐onset seizures: Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (200 and 400 mg/day) when added to one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures. Methods: This multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial randomized patients (age 16–70 years) with partial‐onset seizures with or without secondary generalization to placebo, lacosamide 200, or lacosamide 400 mg/day. The trial consisted of an 8‐week baseline, a 4‐week titration, and a 12‐week maintenance period. Results: Four hundred eighty‐five patients were randomized and received trial medication. Among these, 87% were taking two or more concomitant AEDs. Median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance period (intent‐to‐treat, ITT) was 20.5% for placebo, 35.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p = 0.02), and 36.4% for 400 mg/day (p = 0.03). In the per protocol population, the reductions were 35.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p = 0.04) and 44.9% for 400 mg/day (p = 0.01) compared to placebo (25.4%). The 50% responder rate for lacosamide 400 mg/day (40.5%) was significant (p = 0.01) over placebo (25.8%), but was not for 200 mg/day (35.0%). In the per protocol population, the 50% responder rate for lacosamide 400 mg/day (46.3%) was significant (p < 0.01) compared with the placebo responder rate (27.5%). Dose‐related adverse events (AEs) included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. Clinically relevant changes in the mean plasma concentrations of commonly used AEDs were not observed. Discussion: Results of this trial demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide 200 and 400 mg/day and support that lacosamide may be an advantageous option for the treatment of partial‐onset seizures in patients with epilepsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Cited by
Antiepileptic drug interactions—Principles and clinical implications
I. Johannessen, S., & Johannessen Landmark, C. (2010) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/157015910792246254 · Cited by 343
Biton, V., Berkovic, S. F., Abou‐Khalil, B., Sperling, M. R., Johnson, M. E., & Lu, S. (2014) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12433 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Halász, P., Kälviäinen, R., Mazurkiewicz‐Beldzińska, M., Rosenow, F., Doty, P., Hebert, D., Sullivan, T., & on behalf of the SP755 Study Group
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-453
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2084160703
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjunctive lacosamide for partial‐onset seizures: Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01951.x
- The paper
- Halász, P., Kälviäinen, R., Mazurkiewicz‐Beldzińska, M., Rosenow, F., Doty, P., Hebert, D., Sullivan, T., & on behalf of the SP755 Study Group. (2009). Adjunctive lacosamide for partial‐onset seizures: Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01951.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.