Cited by 210Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDiet and metabolism studies

Successful use of fenfluramine as an add‐on treatment for Dravet syndrome

Open access
Ceulemans, Berten, Boel, Marc, Leyssens, Katrien, Van Rossem, Carolin, Neels, Pieter, Jorens, Philippe G., Lagae, Lieven·2012·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: Despite the development of new antiepileptic drugs, Dravet syndrome frequently remains therapy resistant and is a catastrophic epilepsy syndrome. Fenfluramine is an amphetamine‐like drug that has been used in the past as a part of antiobesity treatments. Because of the possible cardiac adverse effects (valve thickening, pulmonary hypertension) associated with use of fenfluramine, it was withdrawn from the market in 2001. In Belgium, a Royal Decree permitted examination of the potential anticonvulsive effects of fenfluramine in a clinical trial consisting of a small group of patients diagnosed with Dravet syndrome. Methods: Herein, we report 12 patients, 7 female and 5 male, with a genetically proven (11 of 12) diagnosis of Dravet syndrome who received fenfluramine as add‐on therapy. Key Findings: Their ages at their last evaluation ranged from 3–35 years. The mean dosage of fenfluramine was 0.34 (0.12–0.90) mg/kg/day. Exposure duration to fenfluramine ranged from 1–19 years. Seven of the patients who were still receiving the fenfluramine treatment at the time of the last visit had been seizure‐free for at least 1 year. In total, patients had been seizure‐free for a mean of 6 (1–19) years. In seven patients, the fenfluramine treatment was interrupted once during the follow‐up; seizures reappeared in three of the seizure‐free patients. Subsequent reintroduction of fenfluramine controlled the seizures in these three patients again. Only two patients exhibited a mild thickening of one or two cardiac valves without clinical significance. Significance: Compared with a recent long‐term follow‐up series in which a maximum of 16% of patients with Dravet syndrome were seizure‐free, our result of 70% of patients with Dravet syndrome remaining seizure‐free is noteworthy. Given the limitations of this observational study, a larger prospective study should be undertaken to confirm these promising results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03495.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identification of the efficacy of fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome followed the observation that it was particularly beneficial in children with drug-resistant, self-induced photosensitive epilepsy, resulting in seizure freedom in 7 of 12 patients with Dravet syndrome in one study.

    “Identification of the efficacy of fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome followed the observation that it was particularly beneficial in children with drug-resistant, self-induced photosensitive epilepsy 195 , resulting in seizure freedom in 7 of 12 patients with Dravet syndrome in one study 196 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [196]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ceulemans, B., Boel, M., Leyssens, K., Van Rossem, C., Neels, P., Jorens, P. G., & Lagae, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Ceulemans, Berten
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-03
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
1131-1139
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1926532831
Cited by
210
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
Dravet syndrome, fenfluramine, adjunctive therapy, seizure freedom, drug repurposing, amphetamine-type stimulants, pulmonary hypertension, drug withdrawal, seizure recurrence, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anticonvulsants, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Female, Fenfluramine, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review