The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of Brief Alcohol Screening Tests Among Adolescents: A Comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT
Abstract
Background: Adolescents should be screened for alcohol misuse as part of routine care. The objective of this study was to compare the criterion validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers substance use/abuse scale (POSIT), and the CAGE and CRAFFT questions among adolescents. Methods: Fourteen‐ to 18‐year‐old patients arriving for routine healthcare at a large, hospital‐based adolescent clinic completed the four screens and the criterion standard Adolescent Diagnostic Interview, which yields DSM‐IV diagnoses of alcohol abuse and dependence. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine optimal cut‐points. Areas under the ROC curves of the four screens were compared, and sensitivities and specificities were calculated. Results: Participants’ past 12‐month alcohol diagnostic classifications were as follows: no use (58.6%), nonproblem use (13.0%), problem use (20.8%), abuse (5.4%), and dependence (2.2%). Optimal cut‐points associated with problem use or higher were 2 for AUDIT, 1 for POSIT, 1 for CAGE, and 1 for CRAFFT. ROC curve area of the CAGE was significantly lower compared with areas of all other screens. Sensitivities (95% confidence intervals) were AUDIT 0.88 (0.83–0.93), POSIT 0.84 (0.79–0.90), CAGE 0.37 (0.29–0.44), and CRAFFT 0.92 (0.88‐0.96); specificities were AUDIT 0.81 (0.77–0.85), POSIT 0.89 (0.86–0.92), CAGE 0.96 (0.94–0.98), and CRAFFT 0.64 (0.59–0.69). Conclusions: The AUDIT, POSIT, and CRAFFT have acceptable sensitivity for identifying alcohol problems or disorders in this age group. The CAGE is not recommended for use among adolescents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,597
Detecting Alcoholism: The CAGE Questionnaire
Ewing, J. A. (1984) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025 · Cited by 3,005
The CAGE Questionnaire: Validation of a New Alcoholism Screening Instrument
MAYFIELD, D., MCLEOD, G., & HALL, P. (1974) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121 · Cited by 2,249
Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents.
Green, M. (1994) · Cited by 1,662
A Review of Research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
Allen, J. P., Litten, R. Z., Fertig, J. B., & Babor, T. (1997) · Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research · doi:10.1097/00000374-199706000-00008 · Cited by 957
Validity of the CRAFFT Substance Abuse Screening Test Among Adolescent Clinic Patients
Knight, J. R., Sherritt, L., Shrier, L. A., Harris, S. K., & Chang, G. (2002) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.156.6.607 · Cited by 794
Self-citationA New Brief Screen for Adolescent Substance Abuse
Knight, J. R., Shrier, L. A., Bravender, T. D., Farrell, M., Vander Bilt, J., & Shaffer, H. J. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.6.591 · Cited by 625
Self-citationScreening for alcohol abuse using the cage questionnaire
Bush, B., Shaw, S., Cleary, P., Delbanco, T. L., & Aronson, M. D. (1987) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90061-1 · Cited by 540
Grant, B. F. (1997) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1997.58.464 · Cited by 511
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03811.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03811.x · Paper page
- Babor T, 1992, AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<313::AID-SIM370>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<313::aid-sim370>3.0.co;2-k
- Winters K, 1993, Adolescent Diagnostic Interview (ADI) Manual
- Wolraich ML, 1996, The Classification of Child and Adolescent Mental Diagnoses in Primary Care (DSM‐PC)
Cited by
The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings
Reinert, D. F., & Allen, J. P. (2007) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x · Cited by 1,397
de Meneses-Gaya, C., Zuardi, A. W., Loureiro, S. R., & Crippa, J. A. S. (2009) · Psychology & Neuroscience · doi:10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12 · Cited by 596
“…3 (modified) 1 .69 .94 .11 .34 .81 AUDIT 2 .87 .71 .3 .19 .87 AUDIT (modified) 2 .89 .71 .3 .16 .89 Hodgson et al., 2003 AUDIT FAST >1 .93 .88 - - - Knight et al., 2003 DSM-IV AUDIT 2 .88 .81 - - .92 Matano et al., 2003 5 drinks / occasion for men, 4 for women AUDIT-3 Binge drinking 1 .73 .93 - -…”
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2004) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00016 · Cited by 387
Curran, E. A., O'Neill, S. M., Cryan, J. F., Kenny, L. C., Dinan, T. G., Khashan, A. S., & Kearney, P. M. (2015) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12351 · Cited by 250
O’Connor, E. A., Perdue, L. A., Senger, C. A., Rushkin, M., Patnode, C. D., Bean, S. I., & Jonas, D. E. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12086 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, J. R., Sherritt, L., Harris, S. K., Gates, E. C., & Chang, G.
- Venue
- Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-0277
- OpenAlex
- W4253462386
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity of Brief Alcohol Screening Tests Among Adolescents: A Comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2003.tb02723.x
- The paper
- Knight, J. R., Sherritt, L., Harris, S. K., Gates, E. C., & Chang, G. (2003). Validity of Brief Alcohol Screening Tests Among Adolescents: A Comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2003.tb02723.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.