Cited by 77Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The Moderating Effect of Religiosity on the Genetic Variance of Problem Alcohol Use

Open access
Button, Tanya M. M., Hewitt, John K., Rhee, Soo H., Corley, Robin P., Stallings, Michael C.·2010·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that the heritability of alcohol‐related phenotypes depends upon the social background in which it is measured (e.g., urbanicity, marital status, and religiosity). The aim of the current study was to identify whether religiosity moderated the genetic variance of problem alcohol use in men and women at two time points: adolescence and early adulthood. Method: Participants were 312 male MZ pairs, 379 female MZ pairs, 231 male DZ pairs, 235 female DZ pairs, and 275 opposite sex DZ pairs participating in the University of Colorado Center on Antisocial Drug Dependence. Religiosity was measured using the Value on Religion Scale (Jessor and Jessor, 1977), and problem alcohol use was measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview–Substance Abuse Module (Cottler et al., 1989). Data were analyzed using a model‐fitting approach to the twin data. Results: In adolescence, genetic variance of problem alcohol use decreased significantly with increasing levels of religiosity in both men and women, whereas in early adulthood, religiosity did not moderate the genetic variance of problem alcohol use in either men or women. Conclusion: Religiosity appears to moderate the genetic effects on problem alcohol use during adolescence, but not during early adulthood. The reduced genetic variance for problem alcohol use in adolescence may be the consequence of greater social control in adolescence than in young adulthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01247.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Button et al. (2010) showed that religiosity moderated the relationship between genetic factors and alcohol use only in adolescent twins-reduced genetic variance for problem alcohol use with increasing levels of religiosity for both males and females-but religiosity did not moderate alcohol use for either gender in early adulthood.

    “however, Button et al. (2010) showed that religiosity moderated the relationship between genetic factors and alcohol use only in adolescent twins—reduced genetic variance for problem alcohol use with increasing levels of religiosity for both males and females—but religiosity did not moderate alcohol use for either gender in early adulthood.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Neale MC Mx: Statistical modeling 2004 Richmond VA 6th edition Box 980126 MCV

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Button, T. M. M., Hewitt, J. K., Rhee, S. H., Corley, R. P., & Stallings, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Button, Tanya M. M.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-21
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1619-1624
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W1554656704
Cited by
77
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007464)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 011015, P60DA011015)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD010333)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
religiosity, alcohol abuse, heritability, genetic variance, moderation, adolescence, early adulthood, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, social control, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Alcoholism, Child, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Religion, Sex Characteristics, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Genetic Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review