The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Greening the Supply Chain: When Is Customer Pressure Effective?
Abstract
Suppliers face increasing pressure from their customers to improve their environmental performance. When firms downstream in the supply chain seek to achieve such improvements themselves, they frequently request that their suppliers adopt greener practices. This paper investigates the rationale for suppliers to comply with or resist the mandate of their customers to adopt the international environmental management standard ISO 14001 in the North American automotive industry. We argue that the effectiveness of such a mandate will vary according to the characteristics of the relationship between suppliers and customers. We contrast and test hypotheses based on both transaction cost and information theories to suggest that suppliers, whether in a dependent or distant relationship with their customers, have incentives to comply with the requests of their customers but through different mechanisms. Our study analyzed the characteristics of 3,152 automotive suppliers located in the United States, Canada, and Mexico over the 2000–2003 period. Findings indicate that suppliers with highly specialized assets, as well as younger suppliers, suppliers headquartered in Japan, and those reporting to the Toxic Release Inventory, are more likely to respond to their customers' pressures to adopt the certified management standard ISO 14001.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics
David, R. J., & Han, S. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.359 · Cited by 1,127
Cited by
Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: A systematic literature review
M. Tachizawa, E., & Yew Wong, C. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-02-2014-0070 · Cited by 419
Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2013) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1827 · Cited by 341
Self-citationDelmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2011) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq20112115 · Cited by 249
Self-citationDeconstructing corporate sustainability: A comparison of different stakeholder metrics
Antolín-López, R., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Montiel, I. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.111 · Cited by 184
Self-citationA field-level examination of the adoption of sustainable procurement in the social housing sector
Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-07-2014-0359 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Delmas, M., & Montiel, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-201
- ISSN
- 1058-6407 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9134
- OpenAlex
- W2122504912
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 37.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Greening the Supply Chain: When Is Customer Pressure Effective? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00211.x
- The paper
- Delmas, M., & Montiel, I. (2009). Greening the Supply Chain: When Is Customer Pressure Effective? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00211.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.