Cited by 43Green IT and SustainabilitySmart Cities and TechnologiesSustainable Design and Development

Environmental Metrics: The Main Opportunity from ICT for Industrial Ecology

Open access
Zapico, Jorge L., Brandt, Nils, Turpeinen, Marko·2010·Journal of Industrial Ecology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00272.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More information, more timely information, and better visualization of information through apps increase the chances for informed consumer decisions.

    “More information and more timely information (i.e., in real-time; while shopping), as well as better visualization of information through apps, increase the chances for informed consumer decisions [105-107].”

    From Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing? (2020) · cites this paper as [107]

    The Behavioral Change section says Good Guide provides environmental information to consumers at the moment of purchase, and Environmental Metrics says such applications use data to inform users and help decision-making. The paper does not establish that better visualization through apps improves consumer decisions; it also says these applications’ actual sustainability impact remains mostly unverified. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these sections. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zapico, J. L., Brandt, N., & Turpeinen, M.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Zapico, Jorge L.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2010-09-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
703-706
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2017679060
Cited by
43
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
environmental indicators, industrial ecology, dematerialization, behavior change, smart grid, sensors, rebound effect, virtual services, electronic waste, energy consumption, resource efficiency, e-government, online learning, telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review