Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting: State of the Art and Reliability Across Sources

Open access
Fischer‐Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandl, H., Weisz, H.·2011·Journal of Industrial Ecology
DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Bringezu S., 1998, Analysis for action: Support for policy towards sustainability by material flow accounting. Proceedings of the Conaccount Conference Sept. 11–12, 1997, Wuppertal
  2. Bringezu S., 1998, The conaccount agenda: The concerted action on material flow analysis and its agenda for research and development
  3. Bringezu S., 2009, Sustainable resource management: Global trends, visions and policies
  4. Buyny Š., 2009, Input‐output analysis in the environmental‐economic accounting: Calculation of raw material equivalents: Report for the Eurostat MFA task force
  5. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.009 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.009
  6. Eurostat, 2001, Economy‐wide material flow accounts and derived indicators: A methodological guide
  7. Eurostat, 2001, Material use indicators for the European Union, 1980–1997: Economy‐wide material flow accounts and balances and derived indicators of resource use
  8. Eurostat, 2002, Material use in the European Union 1980–2000: Indicators and analysis
  9. Eurostat, 2007, Economy wide material flow accounts and resource productivity: EU15 1970–2004
  10. Eurostat, 2007, Economy‐wide material flow accounting: A compilation guide
  11. Eurostat, 2008, Revised European strategy for environmental accounting. CPS 2008/68/7/EN
  12. Eurostat, 2009, Material flow data (MFA data collection 2007)
  13. Fischer‐Kowalski M., 2011, Decoupling the use of natural resources and environmental impacts from economic activity: Scoping the challenges
  14. 10.1162/1088198041269418 · doi:10.1162/1088198041269418
  15. Giljum S., 2006, Sustainability indicators in ecological economics
  16. 10.1177/1070496503260974 · doi:10.1177/1070496503260974
  17. 10.1080/0953531042000239383 · doi:10.1080/0953531042000239383
  18. Gofman K., 1974, Die ökonomie der naturnutzung—aufgaben einer neuen wissenschaft, Nauka i shisn, 6, 12
  19. 10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00070-3 · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(03)00070-3
  20. 10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00101-0 · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(03)00101-0
  21. Japan Environment Agency, 1992, Quality of the environment in Japan 1992
  22. 10.1016/S0306-2619(98)00011-7 · doi:10.1016/s0306-2619(98)00011-7
  23. 10.1162/1088198043630513 · doi:10.1162/1088198043630513
  24. Moriguchi Y., 2002, A handbook of industrial ecology
  25. Mudd G. M., 2009, The sustainability of mining in Australia: Key production trends and their environmental implications for the future (updated version)
  26. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00154.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00154.x
  27. Odum H. T., 1991, Ecological physical chemistry: Proceedings of an international workshop held in Siena, Italy, 8–12 November 1990
  28. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development), 2004, Recommendation of the council on material flows and resource productivity
  29. OECD, 2008, Measuring material flows and resource productivity: Volume 1. The OECD guide.
  30. OECD, 2008, Measuring material flows and resource productivity: Volume 2. The accounting framework
  31. OECD, 2008, Measuring material flows and resource productivity: Volume 3. Inventory of country activities
  32. OECD, 2011, Glossary of statistical terms.
  33. Pedersen O. G., 1999, Physical input‐output tables for Denmark: Products and materials 1990. Air emissions 1990–92
  34. Schaffartzik A., 2011, Der Rohmaterialbedarf des österreichischen Außenhandels. [The raw material requirements of Austrian foreign trade.] [125], 1‐forthcoming
  35. Schütz H., 2004, Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden.
  36. SERI (Sustainable Europe Research Institute), 2009, Global resource extraction 1980 to 2007
  37. Stahmer C., 1997, Physische input‐output‐tabellen (piot) 1990
  38. Steger G., 2009, Sustainable growth and resource productivity: Economic and global policy issues
  39. Steurer A., 1992, Stoffstrombilanz Österreich 1988. [Material flow balance for Austria 1988.]
  40. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.003
  41. Weisz H., 2007, Rethinking environmental history: World system history and global environmental change
  42. Weisz H., 2007, Economy‐wide material flow accounting: A compilation guide

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
Fischer‐Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandl, H., & Weisz, H.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-08-31
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
855-876
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
DOI
10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x
OpenAlex
W1571298011
Cited by
503
References
55
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting: State of the Art and Reliability Across Sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x
The paper
Fischer‐Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandl, H., & Weisz, H. (2011). Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting: State of the Art and Reliability Across Sources. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.