The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self‐Rated Depression Scales and Screening for Major Depression in the Older Hospitalized Patient with Medical Illness
Abstract
Until now, no self‐rated depression scale had been validated as a screening measure for major depression in the older patient hospitalized with medical illness. The present report establishes the validity of two brief, easily administered depression screening tests, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Brief Carroll Depression Rating Scale (BCDRS), in this population. Structured psychiatric interviews were performed and self‐rated depression measures administered to 128 men, aged 70 and over, consecutively admitted to medical and neurological services of a VA hospital. The GDS and BCDRS were both shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting major depression in this setting. Optimal cut‐off scores determined by the receiver operating curve characteristics of these tests were 11 for the GDS and 6 for the BCDRS. At a cutoff score of 11, the GDS had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 89%, and a negative predictive value of 99%; lowering the break point to 8 did not increase sensitivity. At a cutoff score of 6, the BCDRS achieved a 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 100% negative predictive value. Whether clinicians decide to implement either of these depression screens in their practice will depend to a large degree on the importance ascribed to the detection of these disorders and on attitudes toward the benefits of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Murphy, J. M. (1987) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180068011 · Cited by 367
Cited by
Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., & Allen, N. B. (1997) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.277 · Cited by 1,782
Development of a minimum data set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes
Burrows, A. (2000) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/29.2.165 · Cited by 722
An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement on Assessment of Pain in Older Persons
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Herr, K., Turk, D. C., Fine, P. G., Dworkin, R. H., Helme, R., Jackson, K., Parmelee, P. A., Rudy, T. E., Lynn Beattie, B., et al. (2007) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869 · Cited by 560
Religious coping and depression among elderly, hospitalized medically ill men
(1992) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.149.12.1693 · Cited by 544
The Geriatric Depression Scale: A Review of Its Development and Utility
Montorio, I., & Izal, M. (1996) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610296002505 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Koenig, H. G., Meador, K. G., Cohen, H. J., & Blazer, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 699-706
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2055454145
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐Rated Depression Scales and Screening for Major Depression in the Older Hospitalized Patient with Medical Illness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb07171.x
- The paper
- Koenig, H. G., Meador, K. G., Cohen, H. J., & Blazer, D. G. (1988). Self‐Rated Depression Scales and Screening for Major Depression in the Older Hospitalized Patient with Medical Illness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb07171.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.