The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in an Elderly Population
Abstract
Objective : To determine whether a battery of 13 sensorimotor, vestibular, and visual tests discriminates between elderly fallers and elderly non‐fallers. Design : One‐year prospective study. Setting : Conducted at a 124‐bed Hostel for Aged Persons, in Sydney, Australia. Participants : Ninety‐five persons aged between 59 and 97 years (mean age 82.7 years) took part in the study. Of the 29 non‐participants, four were ill, five were absent (on holidays, etc), and 20 declined. Residents were generally independent in activities of daily living although personal care assistance was available. Results : Eighty‐four participants were available for follow‐up. In the follow‐up year, 40 subjects experienced no falls, 11 subjects fell one time only, 33 residents fell on two or more occasions. There was a total of 145 falls. Discriminant function analysis identified proprioception in the lower limbs, visual contrast sensitivity, ankle dorsiflexion strength, reaction time, and sway with the eyes closed as the variables that significantly discriminated between subjects who experienced multiple falls and subjects who experienced no falls or one fall only. This procedure correctly classified 79% of subjects into multiple faller or non‐multiple faller groups. Quadriceps strength was poorer in the multiple fallers compared with the non‐fallers and once‐only fallers, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was little difference in the mean scores for the tests of vestibular function in the non‐fallers, once‐only fallers, and multiple fallers. Conclusion : It appears that this approach highlights some key physiological factors that predispose elderly individuals to falls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proske, U., & Gandevia, S. C. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 · Cited by 2,223
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits
Horak, F. B., Wrisley, D. M., & Frank, J. (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080071 · Cited by 1,062
Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Moreland, J. D., Richardson, J. A., Goldsmith, C. H., & Clase, C. M. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52310.x · Cited by 988
Goble, D. J., Coxon, J. P., Wenderoth, N., Van Impe, A., & Swinnen, S. P. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.012 · Cited by 426
Freiberger, E., Häberle, L., Spirduso, W. W., & Rixt Zijlstra, G. A. (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03859.x · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Lord, S. R., Clark, R. D., & Webster, I. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1194-1200
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2171797727
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in an Elderly Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb03574.x
- The paper
- Lord, S. R., Clark, R. D., & Webster, I. W. (1991). Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in an Elderly Population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb03574.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.