The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a Telephone Version of the Mini‐Mental State Examination
Abstract
Objective: To assess the construct validity of a telephone‐administered version of the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). Design: Validity testing by comparing a telephone version of the MMSE administered first to a face‐to‐face evaluation done several days later. Setting: Outpatient geriatric assessment center. Subjects: 100 of 175 consecutive referrals. Main Outcome Measures: MMSE and a brief neuropsychological screening test (BNPS) face‐to‐face and a telephone version of the MMSE as part of the Adult Lifestyles and Function Interview (ALFI‐MMSE). Results: Test scores of the two MMSE versions correlated strongly for all subjects (Pearson's r = 0.85, P = 0.001) and remained significant for the cognitively intact ( P = 0.02) and questionably ( P = 0.002), mildly ( P = 0.0001), and moderately ( P = 0.003) demented. Comparison of the two versions' equivalent 22 items revealed no significant difference for scores of all subjects ( P = 0.07) but with a trend toward higher scores in the original version. Diminished hearing, reported either by the subject ( P = 0.003) or by the collateral source ( P = 0.02) was associated with lower scores on the telephone version. Five individual test items were biased by the route of test administration. Sensitivity and specificity relative to the BNPS were 67% and 100% for the ALFI‐MMSE and 68% and 100% for the MMSE, respectively. Conclusion: The scores on the ALFI‐MMSE correlated strongly with the scores of the original version given face‐to‐face in subjects undergoing geriatric assessment. The results indicate that the ALFI‐MMSE could be a useful and economical tool to screen for cognitive impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Cited by
Bakitas, M., Lyons, K. D., Hegel, M. T., Balan, S., Brokaw, F. C., Seville, J., Hull, J. G., Li, Z., Tosteson, T. D., Byock, I. R., et al. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1198 · Cited by 1,726
Delirium Is Independently Associated with Poor Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture
Marcantonio, E. R., Flacker, J. M., Michaels, M., & Resnick, N. M. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04718.x · Cited by 678
Survival in End-Stage Dementia Following Acute Illness
Morrison, R. S. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.1.47 · Cited by 420
Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder in Canada
Van Ameringen, M., Mancini, C., Patterson, B., & Boyle, M. H. (2008) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2008.00049.x · Cited by 408
Type 2 Diabetes and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Elderly Women
Grodstein, F., Chen, J., Wilson, R. S., & Manson, J. E. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.6.1060 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Roccaforte, W. H., Burke, W. J., Bayer, B. L., & Wengel, S. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 697-702
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1987922230
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a Telephone Version of the Mini‐Mental State Examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01962.x
- The paper
- Roccaforte, W. H., Burke, W. J., Bayer, B. L., & Wengel, S. P. (1992). Validation of a Telephone Version of the Mini‐Mental State Examination. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01962.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.