Cited by 223Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Type 2 Diabetes and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Elderly Women

Open access
Grodstein, Francine, Chen, Jennifer, Wilson, Robert S., Manson, JoAnn E.·2001·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To examine the relationship of type 2 diabetes to cognitive function in community-dwelling women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—From 1995 to 1999, we administered four tests of cognitive function (Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status [TICS], immediate and delayed recall of the East Boston Memory Test, and verbal fluency) by telephone to 2,374 participants (70–78 years of age) of the Nurses’ Health Study. Information on diabetes was collected biennially beginning in 1976; 82 women reported type 2 diabetes before their cognitive testing. We used linear and logistic regression models to calculate multivariate-adjusted mean differences in scores and relative risks of a low score (bottom 10% of the distribution) for diabetic women compared with nondiabetic women. RESULTS—After multivariate adjustment, women with type 2 diabetes scored lower on all our cognitive tests than women without diabetes. On the general test of cognition (TICS), the mean difference in score between women with and without diabetes was −0.60 (95% CI −1.18 to –0.03, P = 0.04) and the relative risk of a low TICS score was 1.98 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.69). On a global score combining results of the four tests, the mean for diabetic women was lower than that among women without diabetes (adjusted difference in score −0.73, 95% CI −1.42 to −0.04, P = 0.04), and the relative risk of a low global score was 2.16 (95% CI 1.10 to 4.21). Relative to women without diabetes, longer duration of diabetes was associated with lower scores. Few diabetic women were pharmacologically treated (n = 31), but those taking medication had scores similar to those of women without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS—In these women, diabetes was related to lower scores on several aspects of cognitive function. Longer duration of diabetes may be associated with poorer scores, but hypoglycemic therapy may ameliorate scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1060

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are important metabolic factors in the pathogenesis of AD.

    “Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, which are typical clinical features of T2DM, have also been increasingly recognized as an important metabolic index in the pathogenesis of AD (Grodstein et al., 2001; Luchsinger et al., 2004).”

    From AD-Like Neuropsychiatric Dysfunction in a Mice Model Induced by a Combination of High-Fat Diet and Intraperitoneal Injection of Streptozotocin (2024) · cites this paper as Grodstein et al., 2001

    The introduction (section D; page unavailable) reports a possible association of diabetes or hyperinsulinemia with poor cognition, and the Results report poorer cognitive performance among women with type 2 diabetes. These passages do not establish that hyperglycemia or insulin resistance are factors in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease; the paper examines cognitive test performance, not AD pathogenesis. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grodstein, F., Chen, J., Wilson, R. S., & Manson, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1060-1065
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2154822718
Cited by
223
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (CA40356)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 13482, R29AG013482, AG15424, R01AG015424)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-40356)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cognitive function, community-dwelling elderly women, cognitive decline, diabetes duration, hypoglycemic therapy, memory retrieval, verbal fluency, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Housing, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Massachusetts, Memory, Mental Health, Mental Status Schedule, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Telephone, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review