Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics

Open access
Luchies, Carl W., Alexander, Neil B., Schultz, Albert B., Ashton‐Miller, James·1994·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives : When large disturbances of upright stance occur, balance must usually be restored by taking a step. We undertook this study to examine the biomechanics of stepping responses to sudden backward pulls at the waist. Primarily, response differences between young and old healthy adults were sought. Design : A controlled laboratory study. Subjects : Two groups of healthy and physically‐fit adult females, 12 of mean age 22 (Young) and 12 of mean age 73 years (Old). Measurements : Response kinematics were measured. From them, the stepping strategies of the subjects were derived, including the timing, length, and height of the first step taken and the rotations of major body segments and at major body joints that occurred. Results : In response to sufficiently large backward pull forces, all subjects responded by taking one or more steps backwards. No significant age group difference appeared in the smallest disturbance for which subjects sometimes used a step response. A significant age group difference appeared in the smallest disturbance at which subjects began consistently to use step responses, and that disturbance was larger for the Old than for the Young. Distinct age group differences were found in stepping strategy. At large disturbance levels, the Young mostly responded by taking a single step, whereas the Old mostly responded by taking multiple steps. The steps taken by the Old, compared with those of the Young, were significantly shorter, had significantly smaller heights, and were taken significantly earlier in the responses. Body segment and joint rotations were generally modest, and few significant age group differences were found in these kinematics. Conclusions : In restoration of perturbed balance by step‐taking, the responses of the healthy, physically‐fit young and old adults studied here were similar in many respects, but they differed in some important features. Joint range of motion (ROM) limitations are unlikely to explain age group differences in stepping responses to postural disturbances among healthy subjects because the ROM actually used in any of the responses observed were substantially smaller than the ROM available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04972.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Luchies, C. W., Alexander, N. B., Schultz, A. B., & Ashton‐Miller, J.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
506-512
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2064303189
Cited by
234
References
0
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04972.x
The paper
Luchies, C. W., Alexander, N. B., Schultz, A. B., & Ashton‐Miller, J. (1994). Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04972.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.