The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics
Open accessAbstract
Objectives : When large disturbances of upright stance occur, balance must usually be restored by taking a step. We undertook this study to examine the biomechanics of stepping responses to sudden backward pulls at the waist. Primarily, response differences between young and old healthy adults were sought. Design : A controlled laboratory study. Subjects : Two groups of healthy and physically‐fit adult females, 12 of mean age 22 (Young) and 12 of mean age 73 years (Old). Measurements : Response kinematics were measured. From them, the stepping strategies of the subjects were derived, including the timing, length, and height of the first step taken and the rotations of major body segments and at major body joints that occurred. Results : In response to sufficiently large backward pull forces, all subjects responded by taking one or more steps backwards. No significant age group difference appeared in the smallest disturbance for which subjects sometimes used a step response. A significant age group difference appeared in the smallest disturbance at which subjects began consistently to use step responses, and that disturbance was larger for the Old than for the Young. Distinct age group differences were found in stepping strategy. At large disturbance levels, the Young mostly responded by taking a single step, whereas the Old mostly responded by taking multiple steps. The steps taken by the Old, compared with those of the Young, were significantly shorter, had significantly smaller heights, and were taken significantly earlier in the responses. Body segment and joint rotations were generally modest, and few significant age group differences were found in these kinematics. Conclusions : In restoration of perturbed balance by step‐taking, the responses of the healthy, physically‐fit young and old adults studied here were similar in many respects, but they differed in some important features. Joint range of motion (ROM) limitations are unlikely to explain age group differences in stepping responses to postural disturbances among healthy subjects because the ROM actually used in any of the responses observed were substantially smaller than the ROM available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
C.K, S., Chandran.K, S., & D, P. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul606 · Cited by 733
Balance disorders in the elderly
L. Sturnieks, D., St George, R., & R. Lord, S. (2008) · Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.001 · Cited by 676
McIlroy, W., & Maki, B. (1997) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(96)00040-x · Cited by 489
Perry, S. D., McIlroy, W. E., & Maki, B. E. (2000) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02712-8 · Cited by 396
Age-related Changes in Compensatory Stepping in Response to Unpredictable Perturbations
McIlroy, W. E., & Maki, B. E. (1996) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/51a.6.m289 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Luchies, C. W., Alexander, N. B., Schultz, A. B., & Ashton‐Miller, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-512
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2064303189
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04972.x
- The paper
- Luchies, C. W., Alexander, N. B., Schultz, A. B., & Ashton‐Miller, J. (1994). Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04972.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.