The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in Older Community‐Dwelling Women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of impaired vision, peripheral sensation, lower limb muscle strength, reaction time, and balance in a large community‐dwelling population of women aged 65 years and over, and to determine whether impaired performances in these tests are associated with falls. DESIGN : One‐year prospective study. SETTING : Conducted as part of the Randwick Falls and Fractures Study, in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS : Four hundred fourteen women aged 65 to 99 years (mean age 73.7 years, SD = 6.3) were randomly selected from the community; 341 of these women were included in the 1‐year prospective study. MAIN RESULTS : The prevalence of impairment in all tests increased with age. In the year following assessment, 207 subjects (60.7%) experienced no falls, 63 subjects (18.5%) fell one time only, and 71 subjects (20.8%) fell on two or more occasions. After controlling for age, multiple falling was associated with low contrast visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, poor vibration sense and proprioception, reduced lower limb strength, slow reaction time, and impaired balance, as indicated by four sway tests and two clinical stability measures. Discriminant function analysis identified visual contrast sensitivity, proprioception in the lower limbs, quadriceps strength, reaction time, and sway on a compliant (foam rubber) surface with the eyes open as the variables that significantly discriminated between subjects who experienced multiple falls and subjects who experienced no falls or one fall only (Wilks' lambda = 0.73 ( P < 0.001), canonical correlation = 0.52). This procedure correctly classified 75% of subjects into multiple faller or nonmultiple faller groups. CONCLUSIONS : These findings support previous results conducted in retirement village and institutional settings and indicate that the test procedure aids in the identification of older community‐dwelling women at risk of falls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Goodpaster, B. H., Park, S. W., Harris, T. B., Kritchevsky, S. B., Nevitt, M., Schwartz, A. V., Simonsick, E. M., Tylavsky, F. A., Visser, M., Newman, A. B., et al. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059 · Cited by 3,083
Horak, F. B. (2006) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afl077 · Cited by 2,758
Proske, U., & Gandevia, S. C. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 · Cited by 2,223
Risk Factors for Falls in Community-dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Deandrea, S., Lucenteforte, E., Bravi, F., Foschi, R., La Vecchia, C., & Negri, E. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181e89905 · Cited by 1,455
Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons
Woolcott, J. C. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.357 · Cited by 1,326
Metadata
- Authors
- Lord, S. R., Ward, J. A., Williams, P., & Anstey, K. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1110-1117
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2002886123
- Cited by
- 824
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in Older Community‐Dwelling Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06218.x
- The paper
- Lord, S. R., Ward, J. A., Williams, P., & Anstey, K. J. (1994). Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in Older Community‐Dwelling Women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06218.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.