Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Walking Decrease the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Hospitalizations and Death in Older Adults?

LaCroix, Andrea Z., Leveille, Suzanne G., Hecht, Julia A., Grothaus, Louis C., Wagner, Edward H.·1996·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES : The purpose of this study was to determine whether walking is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalization and death in community‐dwelling older men and women. DESIGN : A prospective study, with follow‐up time of 4 to 5 years (average 4.2 years). SETTING : A western Washington health maintenance organization. PARTICIPANTS : Men and women aged 65 years and older from a random sample of HMO enrollees invited by mail to participate in a health promotion intervention trial (36% accepted the invitation and completed questionnaires). This report is based on 1645 older adults without severe disability and without history of heart disease. Vital status ascertainment was complete (100%), and only 2.6% did not complete the follow‐up. MEASUREMENTS : Reported frequency and duration of walking for exercise, work, errands, pleasure, and hiking in the 2 weeks before baseline were used to classify hours of walking per week. The two main outcomes were: (1) cardiovascular disease hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of coronary (ICD‐9‐CM 410–414) or other cardiovascular diseases (ICD‐9‐CM 390–409, 415–448) documented by computerized hospitalization records and (2) death. Numerous potential confounding factors were considered, including age, sex, treated high blood pressure, current estrogen use and chronic disease score (ascertained by computerized medical and pharmacy records), and ethnicity, education, income, physical function, self‐rated health status, smoking, alcohol intake, and body mass index (ascertained by self‐report on the mailed questionnaire). RESULTS : Walking more than 4 hours/week was associated significantly with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalization in both sexes combined compared with walking less than 1 hour/week (age and sex‐adjusted relative risk = 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.90). This association was not altered by adjustment for baseline cardiovascular risk factors and indicators of general health status. The association was present in all age groups, among those with and without physical limitations, and also among those who did and did not also participate in more vigorous physical activities. Walking more than 4 hours/week was also associated with a reduced risk of death (age and sex‐adjusted relative risk = 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.10), however, this association was substantially diminished by adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and measures of general health status. CONCLUSIONS : Walking more than 4 hours/week may reduce the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular disease events. The association of walking more than 4 hours/week with reduced risk of death may be mediated by effects of walking on other risk factors. These findings provide much stronger evidence than previously available for advising older men and women to embark on or maintain a sustained program of walking to prevent cardiovascular disease events. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:113–120, 1996 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02425.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
LaCroix, A. Z., Leveille, S. G., Hecht, J. A., Grothaus, L. C., & Wagner, E. H.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
113-120
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2082510585
Cited by
252
References
3
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.