The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alzheimer's Disease and Driving: Prediction and Assessment of Driving Performance
Abstract
OBJECTIVES : To examine driving competence in a group of drivers diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in terms of a standardized open road evaluation and expert judgments. To examine the validity of a standardized medical examination, including administration of the Mini‐Mental Status Exam (MMSE), and a standardized neuropsychological assessment as predictors of open road driving performance. DESIGN : A prospective investigation with consecutively referred subjects. SETTING : Coorabel Driver Assessment Centre, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS : Nineteen subjects with a diagnosis of probable AD. MEASUREMENTS : A standardized clinical medical examination, a standardized neuropsychological assessment, and a standardized open road driving evaluation. The driving evaluation provided a correct driving actions score. The outcome measure was the expert judges' rating of overall driving competence, which was termed the final on‐road result. RESULTS : Seven subjects passed the on‐road driving evaluation, and 12 failed. MMSE was found to be a significant predictor of final on‐road result. The physician's prediction, the neuropsychology test scores, and the neuropsychologist's prediction were not found to be significantly associated with the final on‐road result. The on‐road driving evaluation was a reliable test. CONCLUSION : Inasmuch as all subjects except one were still driving and all wished to continue to drive, it is important to note that 63.2% of subjects failed the on‐road evaluation. Conversely, 36.8% were judged safe to drive, suggesting that AD diagnosis alone may be insufficient criteria for cessation of driving. A standardized road test may be the only appropriate means of determining driving competence in people diagnosed with AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evans, D. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430180093036 · Cited by 1,226
Cited by
Transportation and Aging: A Research Agenda for Advancing Safe Mobility
Dickerson, A. E., Molnar, L. J., Eby, D. W., Adler, G., Bédard, M., Berg-Weger, M., Classen, S., Foley, D., Horowitz, A., Kerschner, H., et al. (2007) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/47.5.578 · Cited by 326
Dubinsky, R. M., Stein, A. C., & Lyons, K. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.12.2205 · Cited by 311
Reger, M. A., Welsh, R. K., Watson, G. S., Cholerton, B., Baker, L. D., & Craft, S. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.85 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, G. K., Bowden, S. C., Bashford, G. M., & Smith, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 949-953
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1965793399
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alzheimer's Disease and Driving: Prediction and Assessment of Driving Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02965.x
- The paper
- Fox, G. K., Bowden, S. C., Bashford, G. M., & Smith, D. S. (1997). Alzheimer's Disease and Driving: Prediction and Assessment of Driving Performance. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02965.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.