Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physical Activity and the Changes in Maximal Isometric Strength in Men and Women from the Age of 75 to 80 Years

Rantanen, Taina, Era, Pertti, Heikkinen, Eino·1997·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To research the natural changes in maximal isometric strength, over a period of 5 years, in men and women aged 75 at baseline, and to study the effect of everyday physical activity on strength alterations. DESIGN : A 5‐year longitudinal study. SETTING : Exercise laboratory PARTICIPANTS : The target group in 1989 was the total 75‐year‐old population of Jyväskylä. One hundred one men (81%) and 186 women (75%) participated in baseline strength tests, and after 5 years, 55 men and 111 women (70% and 72% of the survivors) took part in the follow‐up measurements. METHODS: Maximal isometric hand grip, arm flexion, knee extension, trunk flexion, and trunk extension forces were measured using dynamometers. Self‐rated physical activity was recorded using a scale by Grimby (1986). Strength changes were compared between groups based on the amount of everyday physical activity: (1) remained active (AA, 24 men, 24 women); (2) remained sedentary (SS, 11 men, 43 women); (3) decreased activity (AS, 11 women); and (4) increased activity (SA, 32 women). AS and SA could be formed for women only because of the small number of men. All analyses were stratified by gender. MAIN RESULTS : The average percentage change in strength over 5 years among survivors varied from a 4% increase in knee extension strength observed in men and women to a 16% decrease in grip strength in women. The grip strength decrease was greater in women than men. The AA men maintained their trunk extension strength at a higher level than the SS men. Time by group interactions in men were not significant. In women, the rate of decline in AS was 32% in grip and 27% in elbow flexion strength, which was greater than in the other activity groups. The AA women retained their knee extension strength at a higher level than the other groups. Those who died before follow‐up tests exhibited poorer strength test results at baseline. Physical activity decreased over follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: Strength alterations with age differed between muscle groups. Undertaking everyday physical activities such as household work, walking, and gardening, which are also the most common physically demanding activities of older people, may play an important role in maintaining strength at an adequate level for independent living. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:1439–1445, 1997.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03193.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Rantanen, T., Era, P., & Heikkinen, E.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-12
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
1439-1445
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2021184920
Cited by
275
References
0
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Activity and the Changes in Maximal Isometric Strength in Men and Women from the Age of 75 to 80 Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03193.x
The paper
Rantanen, T., Era, P., & Heikkinen, E. (1997). Physical Activity and the Changes in Maximal Isometric Strength in Men and Women from the Age of 75 to 80 Years. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03193.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.