Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Do Advance Directives Provide Instructions That Direct Care?

Teno, Joan M, Licks, Sandra, Lynn, Joanne, Wenger, Neil, Connors, Alfred F., Phillips, Russell S., O'Connor, Mary Ann, Murphy, Donald P., Fulkerson, William J., Desbiens, Norman, Knaus, William A.·1997·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the lack of effect of advance directives (ADs) on decision‐making in SUPPORT might arise, in part, from the content of the actual documents. DESIGN: Advance directives placed in the medical records were abstracted for date of completion and content of additional written instructions. We examined directives with instructions to forgo life‐sustaining treatment in the current state of health to determine whether care given was consistent with preferences noted in those directives. SETTINGS : Five teaching hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 4804 patients with at least one of nine serious illnesses were admitted to five teaching hospitals in the 2 years following implementation of the Patient Self‐Determination Act. Patients were part of a randomized controlled trial to improve decision‐making and outcomes. RESULTS: From the medical records of 4804 patients, a total of 688 directives were collected from 569 patients. The majority of these directives (66%) were durable powers of attorney; in addition, 31% were standard living wills or other forms of written instructions (3%). Only 90 documents (13%) provided additional instructions for medical care beyond naming a proxy or stating the preferences of a standard living will. Only 36 contained specific instructions about the use of life‐sustaining medical treatment, and only 22 of these directed forgoing life‐sustaining treatment in the patient's current situation. For these, the treatment course was consistent with the instruction for nine patients. In two cases, patients may have changed an inconsistent directive after discussion with hospital staff. CONCLUSION: Advance directives placed in the medical records of seriously ill patients often did not guide medical decision‐making beyond naming a healthcare proxy or documenting general preferences in a standard living will format. Even when specific instructions were present, care was potentially inconsistent in half of the cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05179.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Teno, J. M., Licks, S., Lynn, J., Wenger, N., Connors, A. F., Phillips, R. S., O'Connor, M. A., Murphy, D. P., Fulkerson, W. J., Desbiens, N., & Knaus, W. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
508-512
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1993402730
Cited by
348
References
0
FWCI
21.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Advance Directives Provide Instructions That Direct Care? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05179.x
The paper
Teno, J. M., Licks, S., Lynn, J., Wenger, N., Connors, A. F., Phillips, R. S., O'Connor, M. A., Murphy, D. P., Fulkerson, W. J., Desbiens, N., & Knaus, W. A. (1997). Do Advance Directives Provide Instructions That Direct Care? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05179.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.