Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 633

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Drugs and Falls in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis: II. Cardiac and Analgesic Drugs

Leipzig, Rosanne M., Cumming, Robert G., Tinetti, Mary E.·1999·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES : To evaluate critically the evidence linking specific classes of cardiac and analgesic drugs to falls in older people. DESIGN: Fixed‐effects meta‐analysis. DATA SOURCES: English‐language articles in MEDLINE (1966 – March 1996) indexed under accidents or accidental falls and aged or age factors; bibliographies of retrieved papers. STUDY SELECTION : Systematic evaluation of cardiac or analgesic drug use and any fall in people aged 60 years and older. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, setting, sample size, response rate, mean age, method of medication verification and fall assessment, fall definition, and the number of fallers and nonfallers taking specific classes of cardiac and analgesic drugs. RESULTS : Twenty nine studies met inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials. For one or more falls, the pooled Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) was 1.08 (1.02‐1.16) for diuretic use, 1.06 (0.97‐1.16) for thiazide diuretics, 0.90 (0.73‐1.12) for loop diuretics, 0.93 (0.77‐1.11) for beta‐blockers, 1.16 (0.87‐1.55) for centrally acting antihypertensives, 1.20 (0.92‐1.58) for ACE inhibitors, 0.94 (0.77‐1.14) for calcium channel blockers, 1.13 (0.95‐1.36) for nitrates, 1.59 (1.02‐2.48) for type la antiarrhythmics, and 1.22 (1.05‐1.42) for digoxin use. For analgesic drugs, the pooled OR was 0.97 (0.78‐1.20) for narcotic use, 1.09 (0.88‐1.34) for nonnarcotic analgesic use, 1.16 (0.97‐1.38) for NSAID use, and 1.12 (0.80‐1.57) for aspirin use. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity of pooled odds ratios. There were no differences between the pooled odds ratios for studies with mean subject age <75 versus ≥75 years old or for studies in communities with <35% versus ≥35% fallers. In studies of the relationship between psychotropic, cardiac, or analgesic drugs and falls, subjects reporting the use of more than three or four medications of any type were at increased risk of recurrent falls. CONCLUSION: Digoxin, type IA antiarrhythmic, and diuretic use are associated weakly with falls in older adults. No association was found for the other classes of cardiac or analgesic drugs examined. The evidence to date, however, is based solely on observational data, with minimal adjustment for confounders, dosage, or duration of therapy. Older adults taking more than three or four medications were at increased risk of recurrent falls. As a result of the incidence of falls and their consequences in this population, programs designed to decrease medication use should be evaluated for their impact on fall rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01899.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 633

Metadata

Authors
Leipzig, R. M., Cumming, R. G., & Tinetti, M. E.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
40-50
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1964778524
Cited by
633
References
0
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drugs and Falls in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis: II. Cardiac and Analgesic Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01899.x
The paper
Leipzig, R. M., Cumming, R. G., & Tinetti, M. E. (1999). Drugs and Falls in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis: II. Cardiac and Analgesic Drugs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01899.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.