Cited by 39Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

The treatment and prevention of coronary heart disease in Canada: do older patients receive efficacious therapies?

McAlister, Finlay A., Taylor, Laurel, Teo, Koon K., Tsuyuki, Ross T., Ackman, Margaret L., Yim, Rita, Montague, Terrence J., The Clinical Quality Improvement Network (CQIN) Investigators·1999·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives To review the evidence for clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of proven medications in the treatment and prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) in older patients; to summarize Canadian data on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for younger and older patients with coronary heart disease; to explore the reasons for gaps between best care, based on the evidence of efficacy from trials, and usual care, based on the population effectiveness audits; and to explore potential approaches to closing the care gaps. Design Review of the recent clinical trial literature on the management of MI, highlighting results in older patients. Review of medication utilization and outcomes data from a series of large, consecutively enrolled patient cohorts with acute MI (N = 7070) in a variety of cardiac care settings (10 centers in five Canadian provinces, including university-based teaching hospitals, community hospitals, cardiologist and family physician out-patient clinics) from 1987 to 1996. Results There is no qualitative interaction of cardiac therapies: thrombolytics, beta-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and statins are efficacious in all clinically relevant patient subgroups, including older people. However, there are consistent gaps between usual care and best care, particularly among older patients (in whom there is also a concomitantly higher mortality risk). Repeated multivariate analyses confirm older age to be an independent contributor to increased risk…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03837.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This could be the case of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

    “This could be the case of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (Canto et al., 2000; McAlister et al., 1999).”

    From Health From a Gender Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as McAlister et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAlister, F. A., Taylor, L., Teo, K. K., Tsuyuki, R. T., Ackman, M. L., Yim, R., Montague, T. J., & The Clinical Quality Improvement Network (CQIN) Investigators
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Heritage Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
McAlister, Finlay A.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
811-818
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2093275430
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, elderly patients, treatment gap, medication utilization, thrombolytic agents, beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, clinical practice patterns, audit and feedback, care pathways, multifactorial intervention, cost-effectiveness, survival outcomes, Canada
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Coronary Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Quality of Health Care, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review