Cited by 11Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Disparities in adoption of new diabetic therapies with cardiovascular benefits

Open access
Vasti, Elena C., Basina, Marina, Calma, Jamie, Maron, David J., Rodriguez, Fatima, Sandhu, Alexander T.·2023·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP1a) have cardiovascular benefit, but adoption into clinical practice has been lagging. We aim to evaluate use of SGLT2i and GLP1a across socioeconomic strata (SES), medical risk as well as provider type.Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the prescription of SGLT2i or GLP1a within 12 months of clinic visit between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2019 using de-identified claims data. The primary outcome was the composite of a medication fill of either an SGLT2i and/or GLP1a within 180 days of the index visit.Results Of the total cohort, 125,636 (15.8 %) received either a GLP-1a or SGLT2i.The odds of prescription of either medication was 0.64 [p = 0.006)] in patients with heart failure. Patients who identified as Black, Hispanic or Asian had lower odds of the primary outcome [Black: (AOR 0.81, p < 0.000); Hispanic: (AOR 0.87, p < 0.000); Asian: (AOR 0.83, p < 0.000). The odds was higher for those treated by an endocrinologist versus primary care clinician [AOR 2.12, p < 0.000)].Conclusions Prescriptionof SGLT2i or GLP1a was lower among patients with cardiovascular co-morbidities and those who identified as Black, Hispanic or Asian. Further efforts to minimize these disparities should be pursued.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110233

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cost alone does not fully explain unequal prescribing of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, because disparities persist even within integrated healthcare systems that reduce financial barriers.

    “Notably, these disparities persist even within integrated healthcare systems that reduce financial barriers, suggesting that cost alone does not fully explain unequal prescribing [17].”

    From Unequal Access to Evidence-Based Cardiometabolic Therapies: Racial Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results and Discussion report disparities in GLP-1RA/SGLT2i treatment within clinician practices and identify possible contributors beyond patients’ actual costs. But the study used a commercially insured cohort, not an integrated healthcare system shown to reduce financial barriers; its Discussion also describes unaffordability as a critical factor. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]American Diabetes Association, Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2018. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(1): S1– S156.29222369

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasti, E. C., Basina, M., Calma, J., Maron, D. J., Rodriguez, F., & Sandhu, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Vasti, Elena C.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
196
Pages
110233
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312221549
Cited by
11
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, antidiabetic drugs, cardiovascular benefits, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic disparities, heart failure, primary care prescribing
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review