Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Combined Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: A Community‐Based Study

Roberts, Rosebud O., Jacobsen, Steven J., Reilly, W. Terence, Pemberton, John H., Lieber, Michael M., Talley, Nicholas J.·1999·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional, community‐based study. SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Men (n = 778) and women (n = 762), aged 50 years or older, selected randomly from the population. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed a previously validated self‐administered questionnaire that assessed the occurrence of fecal and urinary incontinence in the previous year. RESULTS: The age‐adjusted prevalence of incontinence was 11.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 8.8–13.5) in men and 15.2% (95% CI, 12.5–17.9) in women for fecal incontinence; 25.6% (95% CI, 22.5–28.8) in men and 48.4% (95% CI, 44.7–52.2) in women for urinary incontinence; and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.1–7.6) in men and 9.4% (95% CI, 7.1–11.6) in women for combined urinary and fecal incontinence. The prevalence of fecal incontinence increased with age in men but not in women, from 8.4% among men in their fifties to 18.2% among men in their eighties ( P for trend =. 001). For women, the prevalence increased from 13.1% among 50‐ year‐old women to 20.7% among women 80 years or older (P for trend =. 5). Among persons with fecal incontinence, the prevalence of concurrent urinary incontinence was 51.1% among men and 59.6% among women (P =. 001 and P =. 003, respectively). Cross‐sectionally, the age‐adjusted, relative odds of fecal incontinence among persons with urinary incontinence was greater in men than in women (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9–4.8 in men and OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–2.7 in women, P =. 04). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that persons with one form of incontinence are likely to have the other form as well. Despite the higher prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence among women, the association between fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence was stronger among men than women. This finding, and the significant association between fecal incontinence and age observed in men but not in women, suggest that the etiologies may be more closely linked in men than in women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03841.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, R. O., Jacobsen, S. J., Reilly, W. T., Pemberton, J. H., Lieber, M. M., & Talley, N. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
837-841
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1988148657
Cited by
244
References
1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Combined Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: A Community‐Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03841.x
The paper
Roberts, R. O., Jacobsen, S. J., Reilly, W. T., Pemberton, J. H., Lieber, M. M., & Talley, N. J. (1999). Prevalence of Combined Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: A Community‐Based Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03841.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.