The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zolpidem Use and Hip Fractures in Older People
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The widespread use of sedative‐hypnotics in older populations makes it imperative to identify hazardous regimens that should be avoided and safer regimens that may be used preferentially by older people. Although benzodiazepines have been shown to increase fall and fracture risk, zolpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic, has been advocated as a safer alternative. DESIGN: Case‐control study of hip fracture cases and controls in 1994. SETTING: All subjects were age 65 and older and enrolled in Medicare, and in Medicaid or the Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Aged and Disabled program of New Jersey. PARTICIPANTS: Cases (n = 1,222) were patients who underwent surgical repair of a hip fracture. They were frequency‐matched to four controls (n = 4,888) based on age and gender. MEASUREMENTS: Use of sedative‐hypnotics and other medications was assessed in the 180 days before the index event. We assessed other covariates, including demographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization variables in the prior 180 days. RESULTS: Zolpidem use was associated with a significant increased risk of hip fracture (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09–3.51). Other psychotropic medication classes with significantly increased risks included benzodiazepines (AOR 1.46; 95% CI = 1.21–1.76), antipsychotic medications (AOR 1.61; 95% CI = 1.29–2.01), and antidepressants (AOR 1.46; 95% CI = 1.22–1.75). In subanalyses, preferential use of zolpidem by subjects at greater risk of hip fracture did not appear to explain the apparent risk of hip fracture with zolpidem use. CONCLUSION: Use of zolpidem by older people was associated with nearly twice the risk of hip fracture, even after controlling for possible demographic and clinical confounders. Rather than being a safer alternative, zolpidem may be associated with risks that are as great as those seen with conventional benzodiazepines in older patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
Cited by
Morin, C. M., & Benca, R. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60750-2 · Cited by 976
Risk of Death in Elderly Users of Conventional vs. Atypical Antipsychotic Medications
Wang, P. S., Schneeweiss, S., Avorn, J., Fischer, M. A., Mogun, H., Solomon, D. H., & Brookhart, M. A. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052827 · Cited by 959
Self-citationAn efficacy, safety, and dose–response study of Ramelteon in patients with chronic primary insomnia
ERMAN, M., SEIDEN, D., ZAMMIT, G., SAINATI, S., & ZHANG, J. (2006) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2005.09.004 · Cited by 434
Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study
Kripke, D. F., Langer, R. D., & Kline, L. E. (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000850 · Cited by 408
Brandt, J., & Leong, C. (2017) · Drugs in R&D · doi:10.1007/s40268-017-0207-7 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, P. S., Bohn, R. L., Glynn, R. J., Mogun, H., & Avorn, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1685-1690
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2017415119
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zolpidem Use and Hip Fractures in Older People. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2001.49280.x
- The paper
- Wang, P. S., Bohn, R. L., Glynn, R. J., Mogun, H., & Avorn, J. (2001). Zolpidem Use and Hip Fractures in Older People. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2001.49280.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.