Cited by 166Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Behavioral and Mood Effects of Snoezelen Integrated into 24‐Hour Dementia Care

Open access
Van Weert, Julia C. M., Van Dulmen, Alexandra M., Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M., Ribbe, Miel W., Bensing, Jozien M.·2005·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of snoezelen , integrated in 24‐hour daily care, on the behavior and mood of demented nursing home residents. Design: Quasiexperimental pre‐ and posttest design. Setting: Twelve psychogeriatric wards of six nursing homes, spread over different parts of the Netherlands. Participants: One hundred twenty‐five patients with moderate to severe dementia and care dependency were included in the pretest and 128 in the posttest; 61 were completers (included in both pre‐ and posttest). Intervention: Experimental subjects received an individual 24‐hour snoezel program, based on family history taking and stimulus preference screening. Caregivers were trained, and (organizational) adaptations were made to fulfill the conditions for resident‐oriented snoezel care. The control group received usual nursing home care. Measurements: Observations were made on the wards using subscales of the Dutch Behavior Observation Scale for Psychogeriatric Inpatients, the Dutch version of the Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory, and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Independent assessors observed video recordings of morning care and rated residents' behavior and mood using INTERACT and FACE, respectively. Results: Residents receiving snoezel care demonstrated a significant treatment effect with respect to their level of apathetic behavior, loss of decorum, rebellious behavior, aggressive behavior, and depression. During morning care, the experimental subjects showed significant changes in well‐being (mood, happiness, enjoyment, sadness) and adaptive behavior (responding to speaking, relating to caregiver, normal‐length sentences). Conclusion: Snoezel care particularly seems to have a positive effect on disturbing and withdrawn behavior. The results suggest that a 24‐hour integrated snoezel program has a generalizing effect on the mood and behavior of demented residents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53006.x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review included three RCTs of light therapy, all in care homes.

    “We included three RCTs, all in care homes. 40-42”

    From Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation in dementia: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Methods (p. 2) describe this as one quasiexperimental pre- and posttest study in six nursing homes, not an RCT of light therapy. The study investigated snoezelen integrated into dementia care; the nursing-home setting is the part that matches the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [5]5. Kitwood T. Towards a theory of dementia care: Ethics and interactions. J Clin Ethics 1998;9:2334.
  2. [12]12. Holtkamp CC, Kragt K, van Dongen MC et al. Effects of snoezelen on the behavior of demented elderly [Effecten van snoezelen op het gedrag van demente ouderen]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1997;28:124-129.
  3. [25]25. Finnema EJ. Emotion-oriented Care in Dementia: A Psychosocial Approach. Dissertation. Groningen: De Regenboog, 2000.
  4. [29]29. Verstraten PF. The BIP. Fourteen observation scales for psychogeriatric behavior problems [De GIP. Veertien observatieschalen voor psychogeriatrische gedragsproblemen]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1988;19:147-151.
  5. [30]30. Wee SC. Differentation Adaptation. The Basis of Integration in the Organization Among Medical Specialists in Dutch General and Academic Hospitals [Differentiatie & Adaptatie. Het Draagvlak voor Integratie in de Organisatie onder Medisch Specialisten in Algemene en Academische Ziekenhuizen in Nederland]. Dissertation [Academisch proefschrift]. Nijmegen: SCCMvan der Wee, 2000.
  6. [36]36. Droe¨s RM. The Dutch version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia [De Nederlandse versie van de Cornell Scale voor Depressie bij Dementie]. In: Droe¨s RM, ed. Amsterdam Meeting Centers, a New Way to Support Demented People and Their Carers [Amsterdamse Ontmoetingscentra, een Nieuwe Vorm van Ondersteuning voor Dementerende Mensen en hun Verzorgers]. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1996, p. 214.
  7. [41]41. Volicer L, Hurley AC, Camberg L. A model of psychological well-being in advanced dementia. J Ment Health Aging 1999;5:83-94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Weert, J. C. M., Van Dulmen, A. M., Spreeuwenberg, P. M. M., Ribbe, M. W., & Bensing, J. M.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-22
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
24-33
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2127507480
Cited by
166
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
Snoezelen, dementia, nursing home residents, 24-hour care, behavioral problems, agitation, depression, mood, aggression, well-being, psychogeriatric care, caregiver education, sensory stimulation
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Behavior Therapy, Dementia, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Psychomotor Agitation, Sensory Thresholds, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review