Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of an Individualized Fall Prevention Program on Fall Risk and Falls in Older People: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Lord, Stephen R., Tiedemann, Anne, Chapman, Kirsten, Munro, Bridget, Murray, Susan M., Gerontology, M, Ther, Gymnast Recreat, Sherrington, Catherine·2005·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether an individualized falls prevention program comprising exercise, visual, and counseling interventions can reduce physiological falls risk and falls in older people. Design: Randomized, controlled trial of 12 months' duration. Setting: Falls Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Participants: Six hundred twenty people aged 75 and older recruited from a health insurance company membership database. Interventions: Participants in the extensive intervention group (EIG) received individualized interventions comprising exercise and strategies for maximizing vision and sensation; the minimal intervention group (MIG) received brief advice; and the control group (CG) received no intervention. Measurements: Accidental falls, vision, postural sway, coordinated stability, reaction time, lower limb muscle strength, sit‐to‐stand performance, and physiological profile assessment (PPA) falls risk scores. Results: At the 6‐month follow‐up, PPA falls risk scores were significantly lower in the EIG than in the CG. EIG subjects assigned to the extensive exercise intervention group showed significant improvements in tests of knee flexion strength and sit‐to‐stand times but no improvements in balance. EIG subjects assigned to the extensive visual intervention group showed significant improvements in tests of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. The rate of falls and injurious falls within the trial period were similar in the three groups. Conclusion: The individualized intervention program reduced some falls risk factors but did not prevent falls. The lack of an effect on falls may reflect insufficient targeting of the intervention to an at‐risk group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53425.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Lord, S. R., Tiedemann, A., Chapman, K., Munro, B., Murray, S. M., Gerontology, M., Ther, G. R., & Sherrington, C.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-25
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
1296-1304
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1565975935
Cited by
223
References
5
FWCI
44.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of an Individualized Fall Prevention Program on Fall Risk and Falls in Older People: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53425.x
The paper
Lord, S. R., Tiedemann, A., Chapman, K., Munro, B., Murray, S. M., Gerontology, M., Ther, G. R., & Sherrington, C. (2005). The Effect of an Individualized Fall Prevention Program on Fall Risk and Falls in Older People: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53425.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.