Cited by 344Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Carotid sinus syndrome: a modifiable risk factor for nonaccidental falls in older adults (SAFE PACE)

Open access
Kenny, Rose Anne M, Richardson, David A, Steen, Nick, Bexton, Rodney S, Shaw, Fiona E, Bond, John·2001·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to determine whether cardiac pacing reduces falls in older adults with cardioinhibitory carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH).Background Cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome causes syncope, and symptoms respond to cardiac pacing. There is circumstantial evidence for an association between falls and the syndrome.Methods A randomized controlled trial was done of consecutive older patients (>50 years) attending an accident and emergency facility because of a non-accidental fall. Patients were randomized to dual-chamber pacemaker implant (paced patients) or standard treatment (controls). The primary outcome was the number of falls during one year of follow-up.Results One hundred seventy-five eligible patients (mean age 73 +/- 10 years; 60% women) were randomized to the trial: pacemaker 87; controls 88. Falls (without loss of consciousness) were reduced by two-thirds: controls reported 669 falls (mean 9.3; range 0 to 89), and paced patients 216 falls (mean 4.1; range 0 to 29). Thus, paced patients were significantly less likely to fall (odds ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval: 0.23, 0.75) than were controls. Syncopal events were also reduced during the follow-up period, but there were much fewer syncopal events than falls-28 episodes in paced patients and 47 in controls. Injurious events were reduced by 70% (202 in controls compared to 61 in paced patients).Conclusions There is a strong association between non-accidental falls and cardioinhibitory CSH. These patients would not usually be referred for cardiovascular assessment. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity should be considered in all older adults who have non-accidental falls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01537-6

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orthostatic blood pressure measurements, carotid sinus massage, and tilt testing are well tolerated, even in the frail elderly with cognitive impairment.

    “Orthostatic BP measurements, CSM, and tilt testing are well tolerated, even in the frail elderly with cognitive impairment. 96,396,397”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [396]

    The Methods describe carotid sinus massage with blood-pressure monitoring and head-up tilting, and Clinical investigations reports no persistent neurological symptoms after massage, though 0.8% had transient symptoms (page numbers unavailable). The Methods explicitly exclude people with cognitive impairment. The paper therefore offers limited support for tolerability of carotid sinus massage in selected older adults, but not for the claim about frail adults with cognitive impairment or the tolerability of all three tests. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Cumming K, Lamb SE, Row BH. Interventions to reduce the incidence of falling in the elderly. Co- chrane Database Syst Rev 1998;3:1-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenny, R. A. M., Richardson, D. A., Steen, N., Bexton, R. S., Shaw, F. E., & Bond, J.
Affiliations
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Kenny, Rose Anne M
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
1491-1496
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102093657
Cited by
344
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
carotid sinus syndrome, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, cardioinhibitory syncope, cardiac pacing, pacemaker implantation, falls in older adults, fall prevention, syncope
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Decision Trees, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Pacemaker, Artificial, Recurrence, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Syncope, Geriatric Assessment, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review