Cited by 90Peripheral Artery Disease ManagementCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrailty in Older Adults

Leg symptom categories and rates of mobility decline in peripheral arterial disease

Open access
McDermott, Mary M., Ferrucci, Luigi, Liu, Kiang, Guralnik, Jack M., Tian, Lu, Liao, Yihua, Criqui, Michael H.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether asymptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and leg symptoms other than intermittent claudication (IC) in PAD are associated with faster functional decline than in people with both PAD and IC. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Chicago‐area medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred fifteen people with PAD followed annually for up to 7 years. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline, patients with PAD were categorized into symptom categories, including IC; leg pain on exertion and rest; participants who could walk through exertional leg pain (pain/carry on); and participants who never experienced exertional leg pain, even during the 6‐minute walk (always asymptomatic). Outcomes included mobility loss (becoming unable to walk one‐quarter of a mile or walk up and down one flight of stairs without assistance) and becoming unable to complete the 6‐minute walk without stopping. Analyses adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, ankle brachial index, and other confounders. RESULTS: Always‐asymptomatic participants (hazard ratio (HR)=2.94, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.39–6.19, P =.005) and those with leg pain on exertion and rest (HR=2.89, 95% CI=1.47–5.68, P =.002) had greater mobility loss than participants with IC. Participants with PAD with leg pain/carry on were less likely ( P =.047) to become unable to walk for 6 minutes continuously without stopping than participants with IC. CONCLUSION: The ABI identifies patients with asymptomatic PAD and those with atypical leg symptoms who are at risk for greater mobility decline than participants without PAD and participants with PAD with IC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02941.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): A collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Circulation 2006 113 e463 654 16549646

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDermott, M. M., Ferrucci, L., Liu, K., Guralnik, J. M., Tian, L., Liao, Y., & Criqui, M. H.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
McDermott, Mary M.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
1256-1262
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1561146850
Cited by
90
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL64739, R01HL071223, R01HL064739, R01HL076298, R01-HL58099, R01HL058099, R01HL083064)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00048, M01RR000048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
peripheral arterial disease, intermittent claudication, leg symptoms, asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease, mobility decline, functional decline, ankle-brachial index, exertional leg pain, 6-minute walk test, lower extremity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intermittent Claudication, Leg, Male, Pain, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Mobility Limitation, Ankle Brachial Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review