CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 192Nutrition and Health in AgingBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older Adults

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short-term, light- to moderate-intensity exercise training improves leg muscle strength in the oldest old: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Serra‐Rexach, José A., Bustamante‐Ara, Natalia, Hierro Villarán, Margarita, González Gil, Pedro, Sanz Ibáñez, Maria J., Blanco Sanz, Nekane, Ortega Santamaría, Victor, Gutiérrez Sanz, Natalia, Marín Prada, Ana B., Gallardo, Cristian, Rodríguez Romo, Gabriel, Ruiz, Jonatan R., Lucia, Alejandro·2011·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03356.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of an 8‐week exercise training program with a special focus on light‐ to moderate‐intensity resistance exercises (30–70% of one repetition maximum, 1RM) and a subsequent 4‐week training cessation period (detraining) on muscle strength and functional capacity in participants aged 90 and older. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial performed during March to September 2009. SETTING: Geriatric nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: Forty nonagenarians (90–97) were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group (16 women and 4 men per group). INTERVENTION: Eight‐week muscle strength exercise intervention focused on lower limb strength exercises of light to moderate intensity. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: 1RM leg press. Secondary outcomes: handgrip strength, 8‐m walk test, 4‐step stairs test, Timed Up and Go test, and number of falls. RESULTS: A significant group by time interaction effect ( P =.02) was observed only for the 1RM leg press. In the intervention group, 1RM leg press increased significantly with training by 10.6 kg [95% confidence interval (CI)=4.1–17.1 kg; P =.01]. Except for the mean group number of falls, which were 1.2 falls fewer per participant in the intervention group (95% CI=0.0–3.0; P =.03), no significant training effect on the secondary outcome measures was found. CONCLUSION: Exercise training, even of short duration and light to moderate intensity, can increase muscle strength while decreasing fall risk in nonagenarians.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03356.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Christensen K, 2009, Ageing populations, The challenges ahead, 374, 1196
  2. Binder EF, 2002, Effects of exercise training on frailty in community‐dwelling older adults, Results of a randomized, controlled trial, 50, 1921
  3. Littbrand H, 2009, The effect of a high‐intensity functional exercise program on activities of daily living, A randomized controlled trial in residential care facilities, 57, 1741
  4. Binder EF, 2005, Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition in frail older adults, Results of a randomized, controlled trial, 60, 1425
  5. Serra‐Rexach JA, 2009, Health enhancing strength training in nonagenarians (STRONG), Rationale, design and methods, 9, 152
  6. Altman DG, 2001, The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials, Explanation and elaboration, 134, 663
  7. Rolland Y, 2007, Exercise program for nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease, A 1-year randomized, controlled trial, 55, 158
  8. Brzycki M., 1993, Strength testing, Predicting a one-rep max from repetitions to fatigue, 64, 88
  9. Mathias S, 1986, Balance in elderly patients, The “get-up and go” test, 67, 387
  10. Podsiadlo D, 1991, The timed “Up & Go”, A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons, 39, 142
  11. Charlson ME, 1987, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies, Development and validation, 40, 373
  12. Schnelle JF, 2002, Translating clinical research into practice, A randomized controlled trial of exercise and incontinence care with nursing home residents, 50, 1476
  13. Ouslander JG, 2005, Functional incidental training, Applicability and feasibility in the Veterans Affairs nursing home patient population, 6, 121
  14. Slivka D, 2008, Single muscle fiber adaptations to resistance training in old (>80 year) men, Evidence for limited skeletal muscle plasticity, 295, R273
  15. Ferrucci L, 2004, Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons, A consensus report, 52, 625
  16. Working Group on Functional Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials., 2008, Functional outcomes for clinical trials in frail older persons, Time to be moving, 63, 160
  17. Schmitz KH, 2005, Controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors, A systematic review and meta-analysis, 14, 1588
  18. Molloy DW, 1988, The effects of a three‐month exercise programme on neuropsychological function in elderly institutionalized women, A randomized controlled trial, 17, 303

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 192

Related

Metadata

Authors
Serra‐Rexach, J. A., Bustamante‐Ara, N., Hierro Villarán, M., González Gil, P., Sanz Ibáñez, M. J., Blanco Sanz, N., Ortega Santamaría, V., Gutiérrez Sanz, N., Marín Prada, A. B., Gallardo, C., Rodríguez Romo, G., Ruiz, J. R., & Lucia, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de Granada (ES)
ORCID
Ruiz, Jonatan R.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-31
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
594-602
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
DOI
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03356.x
OpenAlex
W1530243303
Cited by
192
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
resistance training, lower limb muscle strength, oldest old, nonagenarians, detraining, fall risk, functional capacity, grip strength, walking speed, Timed Up and Go test, nursing home residents, one-repetition maximum
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Leg, Male, Retrospective Studies, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle Stretching Exercises, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review