Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frailty Transitions in the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging

Open access
Espinoza, Sara E., Jung, Inkyung, Hazuda, Helen·2012·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To examine frailty transitions in Mexican American ( MA ) and European American ( EA ) older adults. Design: Longitudinal, observational cohort study. Setting: Socioeconomically diverse neighborhoods in San Antonio, Texas. Participants: Three hundred twelve MA and 285 EA community‐dwelling older adults (≥65) with frailty information at baseline (1992–1996) and transition information at follow‐up (2000/01) in the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. Measurements: Five frailty characteristics (weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slowness, and low physical activity), frailty score (0–5), and overall frailty state (nonfrail = 0 characteristics, prefrail = 1 or 2, frail = ≥3) were assessed at baseline. Transitions (progressed, regressed, or no change) were assessed for frailty score and state. Odds ratios ( OR s) of progression and regression in individual characteristics were estimated using generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, sex, ethnic group, socioeconomic status, comorbidity, diabetes, and follow‐up interval. Results: Diabetes mellitus with macrovascular complications ( OR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 1.02–3.33), fewer years of education ( OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93–1.0) and follow‐up interval ( OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.17–1.46) were significant predictors of progression in any frailty characteristic. Mortality increased with greater frailty state, and prefrail individuals were more likely than frail individuals to regress. Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus with macrovascular complications and fewer years of education are important predictors of progression in any frailty characteristic. Because of greater risk of death than for the nonfrail state and greater likelihood of regression than for the frail state, the prefrail state may be an optimal target for intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03882.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Espinoza, S. E., Jung, I., & Hazuda, H.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-08
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
652-660
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2065607665
Cited by
205
References
7
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frailty Transitions in the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03882.x
The paper
Espinoza, S. E., Jung, I., & Hazuda, H. (2012). Frailty Transitions in the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03882.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.