Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations of Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries from Nursing Facility and Home‐ and Community‐Based Services Waiver Programs

Walsh, Edith G., Wiener, Joshua M., Haber, Susan, Bragg, Arnold, Freiman, Marc, Ouslander, Joseph G.·2012·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: Beneficiaries dually eligible for M edicare and M edicaid are of increasing interest because of their clinical complexity and high costs. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence, costs, and factors associated with potentially avoidable hospitalizations ( PAH ) in this population. Design: Retrospective study of hospitalizations. Setting: Hospitalizations from nursing facilities ( NF ) including M edicare and M edicaid‐covered stays, and M edicaid H ome and C ommunity‐ B ased S ervices ( HCBS ) waiver programs. Participants: Dually eligible individuals who received Medicare skilled nursing facility ( SNF ) or Medicaid NF services or HCBS waiver services in 2005. Interventions: None. Measurements: Potentially avoidable hospitalizations were defined by an expert panel that identified conditions and associated D iagnostic R elated G roups ( DRG s) which can often be prevented or safely and effectively managed without hospitalization. Results: More than one‐third of the population was hospitalized at least once, totaling almost 1 million hospitalizations. The admitting DRG for 382,846 (39%) admissions were identified as PAH . PAH rates varied considerably among states, and blacks had a higher rate and costs for PAH than whites. Five conditions (pneumonia, congestive heart failure, urinary tract infections, dehydration, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma) were responsible for 78% of the PAH . The total M edicare costs for these hospitalizations were $3 billion, but only $463 million for M edicaid. A sensitivity analysis, assuming that 20%–60% of these hospitalizations could be prevented, revealed that between 77,000 and 260,000 hospitalizations and between $625 million and $1.9 billion in expenditures could be avoided annually in this population. Conclusion: Potentially avoidable hospitalizations are common and costly in the dually eligible population. New initiatives are needed to reduce PAH in this population as they are costly and can adversely affect function and quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03920.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, E. G., Wiener, J. M., Haber, S., Bragg, A., Freiman, M., & Ouslander, J. G.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-28
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
821-829
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2027883020
Cited by
241
References
1
FWCI
28.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations of Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries from Nursing Facility and Home‐ and Community‐Based Services Waiver Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03920.x
The paper
Walsh, E. G., Wiener, J. M., Haber, S., Bragg, A., Freiman, M., & Ouslander, J. G. (2012). Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations of Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries from Nursing Facility and Home‐ and Community‐Based Services Waiver Programs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03920.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.