Cited by 39Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Light and Heavy Heterosexual Activities of Young Canadian Adolescents: Normative Patterns and Differential Predictors

Open access
Williams, Trish, Connolly, Jennifer, Cribbie, Robert·2008·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to explore patterns of heterosexual activity in early adolescence and to examine the differential pathways to light and heavy heterosexuality. We utilized the National Longitudinal Survey of Canadian Children and Youth (NLSCY) in which heterosexual behaviors, as well as puberty, parenting processes, peer self‐concept, and problem behaviors were examined. The heterosexual activities of the majority of 12‐ and 13‐year‐old adolescents were largely confined to light activities of hugging, holding hands, and kissing. Heavy activities such as petting and sexual intercourse were reported less often. Using predictor variables from Cycle 1 of the NLSCY when participants were 10‐ and 11‐year‐olds, SEM analyses indicated that puberty and higher peer self‐concept shared significant direct pathways to both light and heavy heterosexuality. Heavy sexual activity, however, was uniquely associated with the risk factors of adolescent problem behaviors. Positive and hostile parenting styles were indirectly associated with light sexual activity through peer self‐concept. Positive and hostile parenting styles were also indirectly associated with heavy sexual activity through both peer‐oriented self‐concept and problem behaviors. Results support differential patterns and predictors of light and heavy sexuality in early adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00554.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial adjustment may be affected by factors related to romantic involvement such as relationship quality and sexual experiences, which were not included in the present study.

    “Finally, psychosocial adjustment may be affected by factors related to romantic involvement such as relationship quality (Madsen and Collins 2011) and sexual experiences (Williams et al. 2008), which were not included in the present study.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, T., Connolly, J., & Cribbie, R.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Children's Hospital (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Williams, Trish
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-21
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
145-172
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W2171223080
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • York University Digital Library (York University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
adolescent sexual behavior, early adolescence, puberty, parenting styles, adolescent behavior problems, sexual intercourse, petting, Canadian adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review