Cited by 87Sexual function and dysfunction studiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Prevalence and characteristics of sexual functioning among sexually experienced middle to late adolescents

O'Sullivan, Lucia F., Brotto, Lori A., Byers, E. Sandra, Majerovich, Jo Ann, Wuest, Judith A.·2014·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about problems in sexual functioning among young people, despite the high rates found in adult samples. It is unclear which problems are most prevalent or how common sexual distress is for young people experiencing problems. AIMS: This study aims to assess the prevalence, range, and correlates of sexual problems and distress among a sample of adolescents (16-21 years). METHODS: Participants (mean age 19.2) were recruited from community and area high schools. Male adolescents (n = 114) completed online the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT). Female adolescents (n = 144) completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Both completed the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) and the measures of background, relationship characteristics, and sexual histories. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical cutoff scores on the IIEF, PEDT, FSFI, and FSDS were used to determine whether there was a significant sexual problem. RESULTS: Adolescents reported extensive sexual experience, most in relationship contexts. Half of the sample (51.1%) reported a sexual problem; 50.0% reported clinically significant levels of distress associated with it. Similar rates of problems and distress were found among male and female adolescents. For the most part, adolescent characteristics, backgrounds, and experience were not associated with adolescents' sexual problems. CONCLUSION: Sexual problems are clearly prevalent among adolescents, and distressing to many who experience them, emphasizing a strong need to develop programs to address this issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12419

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Sullivan, L. F., Brotto, L. A., Byers, E. S., Majerovich, J. A., & Wuest, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology   , Fredericton, NB , Canada
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
630-641
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2105652229
Cited by
87
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP210316)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
sexual distress, erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, female sexual dysfunction, sexual function, sexual experience, relationship context, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Sexual Partners, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review